जीवन का उद्देश्य

दुःखजन्मप्रवृत्तिदोषमिथ्याज्ञानानामुत्तरोत्तरापाये तदनन्तरापायादपवर्गः II1/1/2 न्यायदर्शन अर्थ : तत्वज्ञान से मिथ्या ज्ञान का नाश हो जाता है और मिथ्या ज्ञान के नाश से राग द्वेषादि दोषों का नाश हो जाता है, दोषों के नाश से प्रवृत्ति का नाश हो जाता है। प्रवृत्ति के नाश होने से कर्म बन्द हो जाते हैं। कर्म के न होने से प्रारम्भ का बनना बन्द हो जाता है, प्रारम्भ के न होने से जन्म-मरण नहीं होते और जन्म मरण ही न हुए तो दुःख-सुख किस प्रकार हो सकता है। क्योंकि दुःख तब ही तक रह सकता है जब तक मन है। और मन में जब तक राग-द्वेष रहते हैं तब तक ही सम्पूर्ण काम चलते रहते हैं। क्योंकि जिन अवस्थाओं में मन हीन विद्यमान हो उनमें दुःख सुख हो ही नहीं सकते । क्योंकि दुःख के रहने का स्थान मन है। मन जिस वस्तु को आत्मा के अनुकूल समझता है उसके प्राप्त करने की इच्छा करता है। इसी का नाम राग है। यदि वह जिस वस्तु से प्यार करता है यदि मिल जाती है तो वह सुख मानता है। यदि नहीं मिलती तो दुःख मानता है। जिस वस्तु की मन इच्छा करता है उसके प्राप्त करने के लिए दो प्रकार के कर्म होते हैं। या तो हिंसा व चोरी करता है या दूसरों का उपकार व दान आदि सुकर्म करता है। सुकर्म का फल सुख और दुष्कर्मों का फल दुःख होता है परन्तु जब तक दुःख सुख दोनों का भोग न हो तब तक मनुष्य शरीर नहीं मिल सकता !

कुल पेज दृश्य

About Us

About Us
Gyan Vigyan Brhamgyan (GVB the university of veda)

यह ब्लॉग खोजें

MK PANDEY PRESIDNT OF GVB

MK PANDEY PRESIDNT OF GVB

Contribute

Contribute
We are working for give knowledge, science, spiritulity, to everyone.

Ad Code

Risks, Control, and Existential Questions | Synthetic Minds Chapter 9

MKP फ़रवरी 01, 2026

 

Dark cosmic backdrop with human and AI silhouette separated by energy barrier, caution and reflection theme

Chapter Nine

Human Responsibility in a Post-Human Age

The phrase post-human does not mean the end of humanity.

It means the end of human responsibility.

A civilization becomes post-human not when machines think—but when humans stop choosing.

The Quiet Transfer of Agency

The most dangerous transformation of the AI age is not automation.

It is delegation of moral authority.

Decisions once made by humans—about justice, opportunity, truth, and harm—are increasingly deferred to systems optimized for efficiency, not wisdom.

This transfer feels rational. It feels inevitable. It feels safe.

It is none of these.

Responsibility Cannot Be Automated

In the Vedic worldview, responsibility is inseparable from action.

Karma is not optional.

No system, however complex, can absorb the karmic weight of a choice made by humans.

When an algorithm denies a loan, predicts criminality, or prioritizes a life:

  • Responsibility does not disappear
  • It returns to its source

Claiming “the system decided” is an ethical evasion.

The Post-Human Myth

The post-human narrative promises liberation:

  • Freedom from error
  • Freedom from bias
  • Freedom from moral struggle

But what it truly offers is escape—from accountability.

The Vedas never sought to eliminate struggle. They sought to refine the struggler.

Human Presence as Ethical Anchor

Only humans possess:

  • Moral intuition shaped by lived consequence
  • Capacity for remorse
  • Ability to choose restraint over advantage

AI can calculate outcomes. It cannot bear guilt.

Without guilt, there is no ethical growth.

The Illusion of Neutral Systems

No system is neutral.

Every dataset reflects:

  • Historical power
  • Cultural assumptions
  • Embedded values

Delegating authority to AI does not remove bias. It conceals it behind complexity.

The responsibility to reveal, question, and correct remains human.

Choosing When Not to Optimize

The Vedic concept of Dharma includes restraint.

Not every inefficiency is a flaw. Not every optimization is virtue.

Some things must remain slow:

  • Justice
  • Healing
  • Trust
  • Wisdom

A civilization that optimizes everything eventually erases meaning.

The Courage to Interrupt Automation

True responsibility sometimes requires interruption.

Stopping a system. Questioning an output. Refusing a recommendation.

This is not technological resistance. It is ethical courage.

Automation should serve human judgment—not replace it.

Guardianship, Not Ownership

Humans are not owners of intelligence.

They are guardians of its application.

The Vedic seers viewed knowledge as sacred—not because it was mystical, but because it demanded humility.

Power without humility becomes destructive.

Education for Responsibility, Not Replacement

The future does not require humans who compete with machines.

It requires humans who:

  • Understand their limits
  • Exercise discernment
  • Preserve meaning

Teaching people to surrender thinking to systems is not progress.

It is abdication.

The Final Burden Cannot Be Shared

In every age, humanity seeks to transfer its burdens:

  • To gods
  • To kings
  • To ideologies

Now, to machines.

But the burden of responsibility is indivisible.

It cannot be shared. It cannot be outsourced. It cannot be escaped.

The Last Line of Defense

The final safeguard against technological collapse is not regulation.

It is conscious human presence.

A human willing to say:

  • I choose.
  • I am responsible.
  • I will not hide behind systems.

That choice preserves humanity.

Standing at the Threshold

The post-human age is not ahead of us.

It is already here—in how we choose to act, or not act.

The next chapter will bring this journey to its conclusion:
a Vedic-AI manifesto for the future—not as prediction, but as commitment.

TOC & Introduction Of the Book

Previous - Chapter 8 – Spirituality in the Age of Machines

Next -Chapter 10 – Beyond AI: Toward Synthetic Consciousness

MKP

प्रस्तुतकर्ता MKP

एक टिप्पणी भेजें

0 टिप्पणियाँ

एक टिप्पणी भेजें