Every technology carries a direction.
Not in its circuitry, but in the consciousness that deploys it.
The Vedic tradition does not divide the world into good machines and bad machines. It divides human orientation into two fundamental paths:
Artificial Intelligence, as the most powerful Yantra humanity has ever created, now stands at this crossroads.
The Bhagavad Gītā describes two modes of action:
Daivic action arises from:
Asuric action arises from:
These modes do not belong to individuals alone.
They define entire civilizations.
Technology merely reveals which path is being chosen.
Daivic Technology does not reject power.
It disciplines it.
A Daivic approach to AI:
Such technology may appear slower, less aggressive, less “disruptive.”
But it endures.
Asuric Technology is obsessed with capability.
If something can be built, it must be deployed.
If something can be scaled, it must dominate.
In this mindset:
AI becomes a tool of extraction—of attention, labor, behavior, and autonomy.
Asuric systems do not collapse immediately.
They erode from within.
Daivic Technology cultivates awareness.
Asuric Technology enforces surveillance.
Awareness empowers individuals to choose rightly.
Surveillance coerces behavior without understanding.
AI used for total monitoring may produce order—but it destroys trust.
The Vedas never confused order with harmony.
Asuric Technology centralizes power:
Daivic Technology distributes responsibility:
Balance is not inefficiency.
It is resilience.
Asuric Technology seeks to conquer nature.
Daivic Technology seeks to cooperate with it.
AI that maximizes extraction without regeneration violates Ṛta.
AI that supports sustainability honors it.
Nature does not negotiate with domination.
It responds with correction.
Asuric systems reduce humans to:
Daivic systems preserve:
When humans are reduced to variables, injustice becomes systemic.
Many believe Asuric outcomes are unavoidable—that speed and domination are natural to technological evolution.
The Vedic worldview denies this fatalism.
Destiny is not technological.
It is ethical.
The same AI can heal or harm.
The difference is discipline.
Daivic Technology requires:
Asuric Technology offers:
Every deployment is a vote.
Technology exposes what a civilization values.
Not what it claims—but what it tolerates.
If injustice is optimized, the civilization is Asuric.
If dignity is protected, it is Daivic.
There is no neutral middle ground.
This chapter asserts a truth modern discourse avoids:
The future of AI is not determined by capability, but by character.
In the next chapter, we will confront the final responsibility—the human role in a post-human narrative, and why surrendering agency is the greatest danger of all.
TOC & Introduction Of the Book
0 टिप्पणियाँ