WHAT MAKES PEOPLE STUPID
The
mystics have compared man to a ladder. The ladder can be used for two things:
You can use it to go upward, and you can use it to go downward. You use the
same ladder for both purposes, only your direction changes. The ladder is the same,
but the result will be totally different.
Man is a ladder between heaven and hell.
That's why it is only human beings who repress, who manipulate, who kill, who
try to conquer the natural flow of nature. Only human beings are stupid--and
that is because they can be buddhas. Because human beings have intelligence, that's
why they can be stupid. Stupidity does not mean the absence of intelligence; it
simply means you have not used it. If there is no presence of intelligence you
cannot call h u m a n beings stupid. You cannot call a rock stupid--a rock is a
rock, there is no question of stupidity. But you can call humans stupid because
with humans there is hope, a ray of great light. With the human being, a door
opens toward the beyond. Man can transcend himself and he is not doing it--that's
his stupidity. He can grow, and he is not growing, he is clinging to all kinds
of immaturity--that is his stupidity. He goes on and on living in the past,
which is no more --that is his stupidity. Or he starts projecting into the
future, which is not yet--that is his stupidity.
O n e should live in the present with
deep passion, with great love, with intensity, with awareness, and that will
become your intelligence. It is the same energy--upside down it is stupidity;
rearrange it, put it right, and it becomes intelligence.
Intelligence and stupidity are not separate
energies. The energy that functions in harmony is intelligence; the same energy
functioning in contradictions is stupidity. Man can be stupid--but don't think
this is unfortunate. It appears on the surface that it is unfortunate, but
hidden behind it is great glory, great splendor, which can be discovered.
But the society--the so-called religions,
the state, the crowd—wants you to be stupid. Nobody wants you to be
intelligent. They all condition you to remain stupid your whole life for the
simple reason that stupid people are obedient. Intelligent people start
thinking on their own; they start becoming individuals. They start having their
own life, their own lifestyle, their own way of seeing, of being, of growing.
They are no longer part of the crowd--they cannot be. They have to leave the
crowd behind, only then can they grow. And the crowd feels offended; the crowd
does not want anybody to be more than the "average person"-- one who
becomes more intelligent, more individual, more aware, will not be any longer
part of the mob psychology.
You cannot force a buddha to follow
stupid people, and the stupid people are many--the majority, 99.9 percent. They
have a great power with them, the power of violence--and they show it whenever
it is needed.
SURVIVAL OF THE
FITTEST
The
human being is in a dilemma for the simple reason that he is not only
intelligent, he is also aware of his intelligence. That is something unique
about man--his privilege, his prerogative, his glory--but it can turn very
easily into his agony. Man is conscious that he is intelligent. That
consciousness brings its own problems. The first problem is that it creates
ego.
Ego does not exist anywhere else except
in human beings, and ego starts growing as the child grows. The parents, the
schools, colleges, university, they all help to strengthen the ego for the
simple reason that for centuries man had to struggle to survive, and the idea
has become a fixation, a deep unconscious conditioning, that only strong egos
can survive in the struggle of life. Life has become just a struggle to
survive. And scientists have made it even more convincing with the theory of
the "survival of the fittest." So we help every child to become more
and stronger in the ego, and it is there that the problem arises.
As
the ego becomes strong it starts surrounding intelligence like a thick layer of
darkness. Intelligence is light, ego is darkness. Intelligence is very
delicate, ego is very hard. Intelligence is like a rose flower, ego is like a
rock. And if you want to survive, they say--the so-called authorities--then you
have to become rocklike, you have to be strong, invulnerable. You have to
become a citadel, a closed citadel, so you cannot be attacked from outside. You
have to become impenetrable.
But then you become closed. Then you
start dying as far as your intelligence is concerned because intelligence needs
the open sky, the wind, the air, the sun in order to grow, to expand, to flow.
To remain alive it needs a constant flow; if it becomes stagnant it becomes,
slowly, a dead phenomenon.
We don't allow children to remain
intelligent. The first thing is that if they are intelligent they will be
vulnerable, they will be delicate, and they will be open. If they are
intelligent they will be able to see many falsities in the society--in the
state, in the church, in the educational system.
They
will become rebellious. They will be individuals; they will not be cowed
easily. You can crush them, but you cannot enslave them. You can destroy them,
but you cannot force them to compromise.
In one sense intelligence is very soft,
like a rose flower, in another sense it has its own strength. But that strength
is subtle, not gross. That strength is the strength of rebellion, of a
non-compromising attitude. One is ready to die, one is ready to suffer, but one
is n o t ready to sell one's soul.
And the whole society needs slaves; it
needs people who function like robots, machines. It does not want people, it
wants mechanisms. Hence the whole conditioning is to make the ego strong. It
serves a double purpose. First, it gives the person the feeling that now he can
struggle in life. And secondly it serves the purposes of all the vested
interests. They can exploit the person; they can use him as a means to their
own ends.
Hence the whole educational system rotates
around the idea of ambition; it creates ambitiousness. Ambitiousness is nothing
but ego. "Become the first, become the most famous. Become a prime
minister or a president. Become world known; leave your mark on history."
It does not teach you to live totally. It does not teach you to love totally.
It does not teach you to live gracefully, it teaches you h o w to exploit
others for your own purposes. And we think that the people w h o are clever are
the ones w h o succeed. They are cunning, but we call them clever. They are not
intelligent people.
An intelligent person can never use
another person as a means; he will respect the other. An intelligent person
will be able to see the equality of all. Yes, he will see the differences too,
but differences make no difference as far as equality is concerned. He will
have tremendous respect for others' freedom--he cannot exploit them, he cannot
reduce them to things, he cannot make them stepping-stones to the fulfillment
of some absurd desire to be the first. Hence we go on conditioning children.
But before that conditioning happens,
children are immensely intelligent. It has been said by Buddha, by Lao Tzu, by
Jesus, by all the awakened ones. Jesus says: Unless you are like a small child
there is no hope for you. Again he says: Unless you become like small children
you can- not enters into my kingdom of God. Again and again he repeats one of his
most famous beatitudes: Blessed are those who are the last in this world,
because they will be the first in my kingdom of God. He is teaching no
ambitiousness--to be the last. He says: Blessed are the meek, for theirs is the
kingdom of God--the meek, the humble, the people who are standing last in the
queue. It was natural, very natural, that the society he was born in was
against him, because he was destroying the very roots of their ambitiousness.
And Jews have been very ambitious people,
so much so that for centuries, against all hazards, they have carried the idea
in their minds that they are the chosen people of God. A thousand and one
calamities have happened because of this stupid idea; if they can drop it they
will be more accepted in the world. But they cannot drop it--their whole ego is
involved in it. And it is an ancient ego, at least three thousand years old. Since
Moses they have been carrying the idea that they are the chosen people of God.
And here comes this m a n w h o says, "Be the last!" We are meant to
be the first, and he says, "Be humble and meek!" And we are the chosen
people! If we are humble and meek then those who are not chosen will become the
first! And Jews are earthly people; they don't bother much about the other
world. They are worldly: "Who knows about the other world? He is saying,
'If you are the last here you will be the first in my kingdom of God.' But
where is your kingdom of God? It may be just a fiction, just a dream."
Jesus looks like a dreamer, a poet maybe.
But he is destroying their very foundation. They cannot forgive him; they have
not even forgiven him yet. They still carry the idea that "we are the
chosen people." They have suffered m u c h for it; the more they have
suffered the stronger the idea has become--because if you have to face
suffering, you have to become more and more egoistic, more rocklike, so that
you can fight, struggle, so that nobody can destroy you. But they have also
become very closed.
Jesus was creating an opening for them;
they refused him. He was telling them to come into the open sky. He was telling
them to be just ordinary: "Drop this nonsense of being special." If
they had listened to Jesus their whole history would have been different, but
they could not listen.
Hindus did not listen to Buddha for the
same reason--Hindus are also carrying the idea they are the holiest people in
the world and their land is the holiest land. Even the gods long to be born in
India! No other country is so holy. And Buddha said, "This is all
nonsense!" They had to reject him. Buddhism was thrown out of India. No
society can tolerate such people, w h o are telling the truth, because they
seem to sabotage the very structure of things.
But now the time has come when we have
suffered enough. All over the world, in different ways, people have suffered
much, and it is time to have a look at history and its stupidity and its
ridiculousness and drop the whole idea of these egoistic patterns.
Watch
small children and then you will see their intelligence. True, they are not
knowledgeable. If you want them to be knowledgeable, then you will not think
that they are intelligent. If you ask them questions that depend on
information, then they will look not intelligent. But ask them real questions,
which have nothing to do within formation, which need an immediate response,
and see--they are far more intelligent than you are. Of course your ego won't
allow you to accept it, but if you can accept it, it will help tremendously. It
will help you; it will help your children, because if you can see their intelligence
you can learn much from them.
Even though the society destroys your
intelligence it cannot destroy it totally; it only covers it with many layers
of information. And the whole function of meditation is to take you deeper into
yourself. It is a method of digging into your own being to the point when you
come to the living waters of your own intelligence, when you discover the
springs of your own intelligence. When you have discovered your child again,
when you are reborn, then, only then will you understand why the buddhas have
been emphasizing again and again that children are really intelligent.
Start watching children, their responses--not
their answers but their responses. Don't ask them foolish questions, ask them
something immediate which does not depend on information and see their
response.
The mother was preparing little Pedro to
go to a party. When she finished combing his hair she straightened his shirt collar
and said, "Go now, son. Have a good time . . . and behave yourself!"
"Come on, Mother!" said Pedro.
"Please decide before I leave which it is going to be!"
You see the point? T h e child's response
is really of tremendous value. He says, "Please decide before I leave which
it is going to be. If you allow me to have a good time, then I cannot behave;
if you want me to behave, then I cannot have a good time." The child can
see the contradiction so clearly; it may not have been apparent to the mother.
A passerby asks a boy, "Son, can
you please tell me what time it is?"
"Yes, of course," replies the
boy, "but what do you need it for? It's always changing!"
A
new traffic sign was put in front of the school. It read: "Drive Slowly.
Do Not Kill a Student!"
The
following day there was another sign under it scribbled in a childish writing:
"Wait for the Teacher!"
Little Pierino comes home from school with a
big smile on his face.
"Well, dear, you look very happy. So
you like school, do you?"
"Don't
be silly, Mom, "replies the boy. "We mustn't confuse the going with
the coming back!"
The father was telling stories to his
sons in the living room after dinner. "My great-grandfather fought in the
war against Rosas in Brazie, my uncle fought in the war against the Kaiser, my
grandfather fought in the war of Spain against the Republicans, and my father
fought in the Second World War against the Germans."
To
which the smallest son replied, "What's wrong with this family? They can't
relate to anybody!"
STRIVING FOR EFFICIENCY
You
will be surprised to know that your schools, colleges, and universities don't
exist, in fact, to help you to become intelligent--no, not at all. I have been
associated with universities as a student and then as a professor, for many
years. I know the very inner structure of your educational system. It is not
concerned with creating intelligence in people. Of course it wants to create
efficiency--but efficiency is not intelligence, efficiency is mechanical. A computer
can be very efficient, but a computer is not intelligent.
Never think that intelligence and efficiency
is synonymous. Intelligence is a totally different phenomenon. Efficiency is
not intelligence, it is mechanical expertise. The universities are concerned
with creating efficiency so that you can be better clerks and better
bureaucrats and managers. But they are not concerned with creating
intelligence--in fact, they are all against intelligence. The whole structure
of your educational system all over the world is to make you more and more
capable of memorizing things.
Memory is a biocomputer. Intelligence is
a totally different phenomenon. Intelligence arises out of meditation,
intelligence arises out of rebellion. Intelligence does not arise out of
memory. But your examinations only concern themselves with your memory. Whoever
has a better memory is thought to be more intelligent. But it happens many
times that stupid people have beautiful memories, and intelligent people are not
so good as far as m e m o r y is concerned.
Thomas Edison was not good as far as
memory is concerned. He invented hundreds of scientific gadgets; nobody else
before him had invented so many things. Just the quantity of his inventions is
enormous, unbelievable. You may not be aware that you are using Edison's inventions
every day: The gramophone record, the radio, the electric bulb, the fan, the
loudspeaker--all these things come from the creativity of one single person,
Edison. But his memory was lousy, very sloppy, so much so that once he even
forgot his own name, which is really very difficult! It is almost impossible to
forget your own name. If you can forget your own name you can forget anything.
He managed to do the least likely thing.
In the First World War, rationing came
for the first time into existence in America, and he was standing in a queue to
take his ration card. Slowly he came closer to the window. T h e n the last
person in front of him moved and they called his name: "Thomas Alva Edison!"
And he looked around as if they were calling somebody else; he looked up and down
the queue . . .
One man recognized him, and said,
"As far as I know, you are Thomas Alva Edison. Why you are looking here
and there?"
Edison said, "You are right! I had
completely forgotten! Many thanks that you reminded me. Yes, I am Thomas Alva
Edison."
His wife used to have to keep everything
in order because his whole room was in constant chaos--thousands of papers,
research papers—and whenever he wanted to find something it would take days to
figure out where it was. He kept forgetting everything. He might have invented something
and would start inventing it again. And his wife would remind him, "You
have done it! It is already in the market!"
He used to keep loose papers around, and
would go on writing down whatever thought came to his mind. Then those loose
papers would be lost here and there. His wife told him, "It would be
better if you would keep a notebook."
He said, "That's a beautiful idea!
Why did it never occur to me?" But then he lost the whole notebook! He said,
"Look what happened when I followed your suggestion. With loose papers at
least one thing was good -- once in a while I would lose a few notes, but not
all of them. Now all my notes are lost!"
Albert Einstein was not a man who had a
good memory. He failed many exams in school simply because he could not
memorize anything. This greatest mathematician of all the ages, and for ages to
come, was incapable of counting small amounts of money. He would have to count again
and again. Once he was traveling in a bus. He gave the conductor some money;
the change was returned to him. He counted it once, twice, thrice, and each
time the result was different, so he started counting the fourth time.
The conductor was watching and he said,
"What is the matter with you? Don't you know figures? Thrice you have
counted, now you are counting a fourth time! Don't you know how to count
change?"
Einstein said, "Yes, I am a little
lousy in math."
This man who had worked out the greatest
mathematics possible was incapable of counting small amounts of money. He would
go into his bathroom and would not come out for hours because he would forget where
he was and that he should come out. One of my friends, Doctor Ram Manohar
Lohia, went to see him. He told me, "I had to wait six hours because he
was in the bathroom! And his wife kept apologizing again and again. She said, '
He is in the bathroom, he is still in the bathroom.' I said, 'But what is he
doing in the bathroom?' The wife said, ' Nobody knows . . . but if you disturb
him he becomes very angry--he starts throwing things! But he always forgets; whenever
he goes in there he for- gets to come out. N o w we have to wait until whenever
he comes. When he starts to feel hungry or thirsty or something, then he will
remember.' "
Doctor Lohia asked, "But what is he
doing in there?"
The wife said, "I have also been
curious about that for all these years. In the beginning I used to peep through
the keyhole--what is he doing? He sits in the bathtub playing with soap
bubbles! When I asked him, what you are doing?' he said, 'Don't disturb
me--never disturb me, because it is in playing with soap bubbles that I have
discovered the theory of relativity. It is through playing with soap bubbles
that I came to understand that the universe is expanding just like a soap
bubble. It goes on expanding and one day it will burst--just like a soap
bubble!'"
If you
look d o w n the ages you will find thousands of geniuses with very bad memories
and thousands of people who had tremendous memories with no intelligence at
all--because memory and intelligence come from different sources. M e m o r y
is part of the mind -- intelligence is part of no mind. Intelligence is part of
your consciousness, and memory is part of your brain. The brain can be
trained--that's what the universities go on doing. All your examinations are
tests for your memory, not for your intelligence. The universities give you the
wrong impression--as if memory is intelligence. It is not.
This whole
educational system exists to destroy intelligence or to divert you from
intelligence toward memory. Memory is useful, utilitarian. Intelligence is
dangerous; it has no utility for the status quo, it has no utility for the
vested interests. Intelligent people have always proved to be difficult people
just because of their intelligence. They cannot bow down to any stupid thing.
And our society is full of superstitions, stupidities--all kinds of nonsense prevail
in the name of religion, in the name of politics, in the name of literature,
art.
REPRESSION AND MANIPULATION
Each
child is distracted, is diverted. Hence there is so much stupidity. It is really
a miracle how a few people have escaped from this prison--a Buddha, a
Zarathustra, a Lao Tzu, a Jesus, a Pythagoras . . . very few people. It is
almost impossible to escape from this prison because the prison is all around,
and it starts from the very beginning. From your very childhood you are
conditioned to be a prisoner--a Christian, a Hindu, a Mohammedan. And when you
are prisoners of churches, nations, races, then naturally there is going to be
violence.
No animal is as violent as man. Animals
kill but they kill only when they are hungry, otherwise not. Man is the only
animal who enjoys killing for no reason at all, as if killing in itself is a
blissful activity.
One day in a restaurant a lion and a
hare entered. The manager was shocked; he could not believe his eyes. A great
silence fell over the restaurant. Many people were there eating, talking, gossiping;
all became absolutely silent. What was happening? The manager rushed to the new
customers. Somehow he managed to stammer to the hare, "What would you
like, sir?"
The hare asked for coffee. The manager
asked, "And what would your friend like to have?"
The
hare laughed and he said, "Do you think if he were hungry I would be here?
He is not hungry; otherwise he would have eaten his breakfast and I would be
gone! We can be together only when he is not hungry."
A Hon won't kill if he is not hungry. It
is only man who kills for no reason at all--for stupid ideas. One can
understand--if somebody is hungry, one can understand. But one cannot
understand Hiroshima and Nagasaki--destroying a hundred thousand people within
three minutes, just for the sheer joy of destruction.
This is happening because we have not
allowed man's intelligence to flower. And whenever it has happened in any society
that intelligence is allowed a little freedom, that society has become weaker
than other societies. It happened in India: India remained a slave for two
thousand years for many reasons. One of the reasons was the great revolution
that was brought by Krishna, Patanjali, Saraha, Mahavira, Buddha. These people brought
such a great revolution, such a radical change in the consciousness of India,
that many people were released from the bondage of stupidity; a great
intelligence was released. The result was that the intelligent people stopped
killing, they became nonviolent; they refused to be recruited into the army.
Buddhists and Jains refused to be recruited into the army, the Brahmins refused
to be recruited into the army. Now this was the cream, and the cream refused to
fight. Then very stupid countries and very ordinary people--Huns, Turks,
Moghuls, who were backward in every possible way--overran the country. And
because the most intelligent people of the younger generation were no longer
interested in killing and violence, there was no resistance, no fight. These people
conquered the country—a big country was conquered by very small countries. For
two thousand years India remained in slavery for that simple reason.
The same thing happened in Athens. Socrates,
Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Heraclitus . . . these were the people w h o released
great intelligence, and a climate was created of freedom, of free thinking. It
was one of the most beautiful phenomena that was happening on the earth, and it
was destroyed by stupid people, barbarians. The whole Greek civilization
disappeared.
My own suggestion is that unless we
create a world government, intelligence cannot be allowed. The time has come
for a world government. National governments are no longer needed: They are
things of the past; they are part of our stupid past. Nations are no longer
needed, only a world government. And if there is a world government it will
have a totally different quality.
Armies will have to be reduced, because
there will be no question of fighting with anybody. Now seventy percent of the
world's money, wealth, and resources go to the military and military
weapons—seventy percent! Only thirty percent is left for other purposes. That
means seventy percent of our energy is devoted to killing, to being violent, to
being destructive.
A world government is an absolute necessity
to save humanity. A n d the quality of the world government will be totally
different because it won't need great armies; just small police forces will.be
enough. It will take care of all things like the post office, the railway, the
airplanes, etcetera--but they are not destructive; they serve people. And once
the armies disappear from the world, great intelligence will be released-- because
the army is destructive of intelligence. It recruits the healthiest people and
destroys their minds, because a real soldier is possible only if the person
becomes absolutely mechanical.
Man kills for no reason. Man tries to
repress rather than to understand, to manipulate rather than to relate, because
to relate with somebody needs great understanding.
Manipulation needs no understanding.
Repression is easy, very easy--any fool can do it. That's w h y if you go to
the monasteries you will find all kinds of repressions and you will find all
kinds of fools gathered together there. I have never come across intelligent
monks and nuns; if they are intelligent they will not be monks and nuns
anymore. They will renounce that nonsense; they will come out of their
so-called religious prisons. But repression needs no wisdom; it simply needs a
powerful ego, so you can go on suppressing everything into the unconscious. But
whatever you suppress will have to be suppressed again and again--and still it
will never be eliminated. It will become more and more powerful as you grow
older because you will become weaker. The suppressor will become weaker and the
suppressed will remain fresh and young, because it has never been used.
The real problem arises in old age when
suppression starts exploding and creates all kinds of ugliness. It is five
thousand years of suppression that is creating all our neuroses, all our perversions.
Suppress sex and you will become more sexual; your whole life will be colored
with sex. You will think always in terms of sexuality and nothing else.
Suppress sex and the ugly institution of prostitution will arise, is bound to
arise. The more suppressive a society is, the more prostitutes will be found
there; the proportion is always the same. You can count your nuns and monks and
you can know by counting them how many male and female prostitutes will be in
the country. It will be exactly the same number because nature keeps a balance.
And perversions… because sexual energy will find its ways, its own ways. Either
it will create neurosis or hypocrisy. Both are ill states. The poor will become
neurotic and the rich will become hypocrites.
It is said that when Moses in his rage
smashed the tablets of the Ten Commandments, everybody rushed to grab a piece.
Of course the rich and the politicians
were the first. They got all the good pieces on which were inscribed, "Commit
adultery," "lie," "steal." The poor and all the rest
got only the pieces that said, "Thou shalt not," "Thou shalt
not."
Repression creates cunningness. You lose
authenticity; you lose naturalness, spontaneity you lose truth. You start lying
to others, you start lying to yourself. You start finding ways to he and to go
on lying. And a single lie will need a thousand other lies to protect it, to
support it.
THE SIN OF
DISOBEDIENCE
It is
said that w h e n Henry Thoreau came out of the university, Emerson gave a big
party to celebrate the occasion. And he told the participants, "I am
giving this party not because Thoreau has attained great knowledge in the
university but because he has been able to come back from the university and he
is still intelligent. T h e university has not been able to destroy his
intelligence. T h e university has failed, that's why I am giving this party! I
respect this young man for the simple reason that he has escaped from the whole
cunning strategy that is our education."
Intelligence simply means the ability to
respond, because life is a flux. You have to be aware and to see what is
demanded of you, what is the challenge of the situation. The intelligent person
behaves according to the situation, and the stupid behaves according to the
ready-made answers. Whether those answers come from Buddha, Christ, or Krishna,
he always carries "scriptures" around himself. He is afraid to depend
on himself. T h e intelligent person depends on his own insight. He trusts his own
being. He loves and respects himself. T h e unintelligent person respects
others.
And you can see the point -- why are the
vested interests interested in creating stupidity? Because that is the only way
they can get respect. No parents really want their children to be intelligent,
because if the children are intelligent they are rebellious, too; they are
disobedient, too. Obedience has been imposed on you as a great value--it is
not. It is one of the basic causes of the destruction of your intelligence.
I am not saying be disobedient. I am
simply saying that when you feel like being obedient, be obedient; when you
feel like being disobedient, be true to yourself. Your only responsibility is
toward yourself and nobody else.
An intelligent person takes risks. He will
be ready to die rather than to compromise. Of course, he will not fight about unnecessary
things, he will not fight about nonessentials--but as far as the essentials are
concerned he is not going to be obedient.
But you have obeyed even about the essentials.
What is your belief in God? You have simply obeyed others. What do you know
about God? You have simply obeyed; you have followed your parents, and they followed
their parents. Parents are happy with unintelligent children because they are
obedient -- they have to be obedient. The children come to know one thing that
whatever they do is bound to be wrong, so it is better to listen to the
parents' advice.
For thousands of years every society has
been telling children, "Respect your parents," because they are afraid
of children--they may not respect their parents. And I am not saying to
disrespect your parents. I am simply saying that you must first respect
yourself. Out of that respect, you can respect your parents, your teachers--you
can respect everybody. But if you don't respect yourself, your respect for
anybody else is going to be false; deep down there will be hatred. Each child
hates his parents . . . deep down he feels, "The parents are my
enemies." He can see how his intelligence is being crippled.
After putting her two children to bed one
night, a young mother changed into a ragged blouse and an old pair of slacks
and proceeded to wash her hair. All during the shampoo she could hear the
children growing wilder and noisier. Finishing as hurriedly as possible, she
wrapped a large towel around her head, stormed into their room, and put them
back to bed with a stern warning to stay there. As she left, she heard the
two-year-old say to his sister in a trembling voice, "Who was that?"
This is intelligence!
But the society is not interested in
intelligent people. It is not interested in seekers, it is interested in
soldiers. It wants to create soldiers. And unless you are stupid you cannot be
a good soldier. The greater you are in your stupidity the better, as far as
being a soldier is concerned.
As
the last soldier was about to j u m p from the airplane he panicked, grabbed
hold of his sergeant and said, "What happens if my second parachute
doesn't open, either?"
"Don't worry," said the sergeant
with a smile. "Just come back and I will give you a new one!"
Life is a beautiful journey if it is a process
of constant learning, exploration. Then it is excitement every moment, because
every moment you are opening a new door, every moment you are coming in contact
with a new mystery.
The word disciple means one who learns,
and discipline means the process of learning. But the word has been
prostituted. Now discipline means obedience. They have turned the whole world
into a Boy Scout camp. High above there is somebody who knows--you need not
learn, you have simply to obey. They have turned the meaning of discipline in
to its very opposite.
Learning automatically consists of doubting,
of questioning, of being skeptical, of being curious--not of being a believer
certainly, because a believer never learns. But they have used the word for
thousands of years in this way. And it is not only one word that they have
prostituted, they have prostituted many words. Beautiful words have become so
ugly in the hands of the vested interests that you cannot even imagine the original
meaning of the word . . . thousands of years of misuse.
They want everybody to be disciplined the
way people are disciplined in the army. You are ordered and you have to do it
without asking why. This is not the way of learning! And from the very beginning
they have imposed stories on the minds of people--for example that the first sin
committed was disobedience. Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden
because they disobeyed.
I have looked at it in thousands of
ways, but I don't see that Adam and Eve committed any sin or any crime. They
were simply exploring. You are in a garden and you start exploring the fruits
and flowers and what is edible and what is not edible.
And God is responsible, because he
prohibited them from two trees. He indicated the trees: "You should not
approach these two trees. One is the tree of wisdom, and the other is the tree
of eternal life." Just think, if you were Adam and Eve--was not God
himself tempting you to go to these two trees? And those two trees were of
wisdom and of eternal life--why should God be against them? If he were really a
father, one who loved you, he might have pointed to them, saying, "This is
a poisonous tree, don't eat from it." Or, "This is the tree of death;
if you eat anything from it you will die." But these two trees are
perfectly good! Eat as much as you can, because to be wise and to have eternal
life is absolutely right.
Every father would want his children to
have wisdom and eternal life. This father seems to be absolutely loveless. Not
only loveless but, as the devil said to Eve, "He has prevented you from
these two trees. Do you know the reason? The reason is that if you eat from
these two trees you will be equal to him, and he is jealous. He does not want
you to become divine. He does not want you to become gods, full of wisdom and eternal
life."
I cannot see that the devil's argument
has any flaw in it. It is absolutely right. In fact, he is the first benefactor
of humanity. Without him, perhaps there would have been no humanity--no Gautam
Buddha, no Kabir, no Christ, no Zarathustra, no Lao Tzu . . . just buffaloes
and donkeys, all eating grass, chewing grass contentedly. And God would have been
very happy, that his children are very obedient!
But this obedience is poison, pure
poison. The devil must be counted as the first revolutionary of the world, and
the first m a n to think in terms of evolution, of wisdom, of eternal life.
JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS
All
over the world, in every army, they are turning millions of people into
machines--of course, in such a way that you don't understand what is going on. Their
methodology is very indirect.
What does it mean that thousands of
people every morning are marching, following orders: "Right turn, left
turn, move forward, move backward." For what is this entire circus going
on? And for years it goes on.
This is to destroy your intelligence. For years continuously you go on
following any kind of stupid order, meaningless, every day in the morning,
every day in the evening--and you are not supposed to ask why. You just have to
do it, to do it as perfectly as possible; there is no need for you to
understand why. And w h e n a person goes through such training for years, the natural
effect is that he stops asking why.
The questioning attitude is the very base
of all intelligence. The moment you stop asking why, you have stopped growing as
far as intelligence is concerned.
It happened in the Second World War . . .
A
retired army man . . . he had fought in the First World War and he was honored;
he was a brave man. And now almost twenty-five years had passed. He had a small
farm and lived silently.
He was going from the farm to the
town with a bucketful of eggs, and a few people in a restaurant, just jokingly,
played a trick on the poor old army man. One of the men in the restaurant
shouted, "Attention!" and the man dropped the bucket and stood in the
position of attention.
It had been twenty-five years since he had
gone through the training. But the training had gone into the bones, into the
blood, into the marrow; it had become part of the unconscious. He completely
forgot what he was doing--it happened almost autonomously, mechanically.
He
was very angry. But those people said, "Your anger is not right, because
we can call out any word we want. W h o is telling you to follow it?"
He
said, "It is too late for me to decide whether to follow it or not to
follow it. My whole mind functions like a machine.
Those twenty- five years simply
disappeared. Attention only means attention. You destroyed my eggs, and I am a
poor man . . ."
But this is being done all over the
world. And not only today; from the very beginning armies have been trained not
to use their intelligence but to follow orders.
You have to understand one thing very
clearly: To follow an order and to understand a thing are two diametrically
opposite things. If, by understanding, your intelligence feels satisfied and
you do something out of that, you are not following an order from the outside;
you are following your own intelligence.
I
am reminded of another incident in the First World War. In Berlin, a German
professor of logic was recruited into the army. There was a shortage of
soldiers, and everybody who was physically able was asked to volunteer.
Otherwise, they were forcing people to join the army. All the societies, all
the nations, all the cultures, have taken, it for granted that the individual
exists for them, not vice versa.
To me, just the opposite is the case: T
h e society exists for the individual, the culture exists for the individual, and
the nation exists for the individual. Everything else can be sacrificed, but
the individual cannot be sacrificed for anything. Individuality is the very
flowering of existence nothing is higher. But no culture, no society, no
civilization is ready to accept that simple truth.
The professor was forced to volunteer
for the army. He said, "I am not a man who can fight. I can argue, I am a
logician. If you need some-body to argue with the enemies I am ready, but
fighting is not my business. It is barbarous to fight."
But nobody listened, and finally he was
brought to the parade grounds. The parade started, and the commander said,
"Left turn." Everybody turned left, but the professor remained
standing as he was standing.
The commander was a little worried:
"What is the matter? Perhaps the man is deaf." So he shouted loudly,
"Now turn to the left again!" All the people turned to the left
again, but that man remained standing as if he had not heard anything. Forward,
backward . . . all the orders were given and everybody followed. That man
remained just standing in his place.
He was a well-known professor; even the
commander knew him. He could not be treated just like any other soldier, he
inspired a certain respect. Finally, w h e n the parade ended and everybody
returned to where they had started, the commander went to the professor and
asked, "Is there some problem with your ears? Can't you hear?"
He said, "I can hear."
"But then," the commander said,
"why did you remain standing? Why did you not follow the orders?"
He said, "What is the point? When
everybody finally has to come back to the same state, after all this movement
going forward and backward, left and right, what have they gained?"
The commander said, "It is not a
question of gaining, it is a question of training!"
But he said, "I don't need any training.
You come to the same place after doing all kinds of stupid things, which I
don't see any point in. Can you explain to me why I should turn left and not
right?"
The commander said, "Strange, no
soldier asks such questions."
The professor said, "I am not a
soldier, I am a professor. I have been forced to be here, but you cannot force
me to do things against my intelligence."
The commander went to the higher
authorities and said, "What to do with this man? He may ruin the others--because
everybody is laughing at me and everybody is saying, 'Professor, you did
great!' I cannot tackle that man. He asks such questions, and each thing has to
be explained: 'Unless I understand it, unless my intelligence supports it, I am
not going to do it.'"
T h e commander in chief said, "I k
n o w the man. He is a great logician. His whole life's training is in questioning
everything. I will take care of him, don't be worried."
He called the professor to his office and
said, "I am sorry, but we cannot do anything. You have been recruited; the
country needs soldiers. But I will give you some work that will not create any
difficulty for you and will not create any difficulty for others. You come with
me to the army mess."
He took the professor there, and showed
him a big pile of green peas. He told the professor, "Sit down here. You
can sort out the big peas on one side and the small peas on the other side. In
an hour I will come to see h o w things are progressing."
After an hour he came back. The professor
was sitting there and the peas were also sitting there, in the same place. He
said, " W h a t is the matter? You have not even started."
The professor said, "For the first
and for the last time, I want you all to understand that unless you explain to
me . . . Why I should sort out the peas? My intelligence feels insulted by you.
Am I an idiot, to sort these peas? W h a t is the need? Moreover, there are
other difficulties. Sitting here, I thought that perhaps there could be some
need, but there are questions which have to be decided: There are peas that are
big and there are peas that are small, but there are peas of many other sizes.
Where are they going to go? You have not given me any criteria."
Orders, disciplines, guidelines--these
have been used by people who wanted to dominate you, by people w h o wanted to
dictate their terms, to enforce their ideas on other people's lives. I call all
such people great criminals. To impose their ideas on somebody, to enforce some
ideal, some mold, is violence, sheer violence. They are being destructive.
0 Comments
If you have any Misunderstanding Please let me know