Introduction
THE
literature of the Hindus has now been cultivated for many years with singular
diligence, and in many of its branches with eminent success. There are some
departments, however, which are yet but partially and imperfectly investigated;
and we are far from being in possession of that knowledge which the authentic
writings of the Hindus alone can give us of their religion, mythology, and
historical traditions.
From
the materials to which we have hitherto had access, it seems probable that there
have been three principal forms in which the religion of the Hindus has
existed, at as many different periods. The duration of those periods, the
circumstances of their succession, and the precise state of the national faith
at each season, it is not possible to trace with any approach to accuracy. The
premises have been too imperfectly determined to authorize other than
conclusions of a general and somewhat vague description, and those remain to be
hereafter confirmed or corrected by more extensive and satisfactory research.
The
earliest form under which the Hindu religion appears is that taught in the
Vedas. The style of the language, and the purport of the composition of those
works, as far as we are acquainted with them, indicate a date long anterior to
that of any other class of Sanscrit writings. It is yet, however, scarcely safe
to advance an opinion of the precise belief or philosophy which they inculcate.
To enable us to judge of their tendency, we have only a general sketch of their
arrangement and contents, with a few extracts, by Mr. Colebrooke, in the
Asiatic Researches; a few incidental observations by Mr. Ellis, in the same
miscellany; and a translation of the first book of the Sanhita, or collection
of the prayers of the Rig-veda, by Dr. Rosen; and some of the Upanishads, or speculative treatises, attached to,
rather than part of, the Vedas, by Rammohun Roy. Of the religion taught in the
Vedas, Mr. Colebrooke's opinion will probably be received as that which is best
entitled to deference, as certainly no Sanskrit scholar has been equally
conversant with the original works. "The real doctrine of the Indian
scripture is the unity of the Deity, in whom the universe is comprehended; and
the seeming polytheism which it exhibits, offers the elements and the stars and
planets as gods. The three principal manifestations of the divinity, with other
personified attributes and energies, and most of the other gods of Hindu
mythology, are indeed mentioned, or at least indicated, in the Veda. But the
worship of deified heroes is no part of the system; nor are the incarnations of
deities suggested in any portion of the text which I have yet seen, though such
are sometimes hinted at by the commentators." Some of these statements may
perhaps require modification; for without a careful examination of all the
prayers of the Vedas, it would be hazardous to assert that they contain no
indication whatever of hero-worship; and certainly they do appear to allude
occasionally to the Avataras, or incarnations, of Vishnu. Still, however, it is
true that the prevailing character of the ritual of the Vedas is the worship of
the personified elements; of Agni, or fire; Indra, the firmament; Vayu, the
air; Varuna, the water; of Aditya, the sun; Soma, the moon; and other
elementary and planetary personages. It is also true that the worship of the
Vedas is for the most part domestic worship, consisting of prayers and
oblations offered--in their own houses, not in temples--by individuals for
individual good, and addressed to unreal presences, not to visible types. In a
word, the religion of the Vedas was not idolatry.
It
is not possible to conjecture when this more simple and primitive form of
adoration was succeeded by the worship of images and types, representing
Brahma, Vishnu, S'iva, and other imaginary beings, constituting a mythological
pantheon of most ample extent; or when Rama and Krishna, who appear to have been originally real and
historical characters, were elevated to the dignity of divinities.
Image-worship is alluded to by Manu in several passages [*6], but with an
intimation that those Brahmans who subsist by ministering in temples are an
inferior and degraded class. The story of the Ramayana and Mahabharata turns
wholly upon the doctrine of incarnations, all the chief dramatis personae of
the poems being impersonations of gods and demigods and celestial spirits. The
ritual appears to be that of the Vedas, and it may be doubted if any allusion
to image-worship occurs; but the doctrine of propitiation by penance and praise
prevails throughout, and Vishnu and S'iva are the especial objects of panegyric
and invocation. In these two works, then, we trace unequivocal indications of a
departure from the elemental worship of the Vedas, and the origin or
elaboration of legends, which form the great body of the mythological religion
of the Hindus. How far they only improved upon the cosmogony and chronology of
their predecessors, or in what degree the traditions of families and dynasties
may originate with them, are questions that can only be determined when the
Vedas and the two works in question shall have been more thoroughly examined.
The
different works known by the name of Puranas are evidently derived from the same
religious system as the Ramayana and Mahabharata, or from the mytho-heroic
stage of Hindu belief. They present, however, peculiarities which designate
their belonging to a later period, and to an important modification in the
progress of opinion. They repeat the theoretical cosmogony of the two great
poems; they expand and systematize the chronological computations; and they
give a more definite and connected representation of the mythological fictions,
and the historical traditions. But besides these and other particulars, which
may be derivable from an old, if not from a primitive era, they offer
characteristic peculiarities of a more modern description, in the paramount
importance which they assign to individual divinities, in the variety and purport
of the rites and observances addressed to them, and in the invention of new
legends illustrative of the power and graciousness of those deities, and of the efficacy of implicit devotion to them.
S'iva and Vishnu, under one or other form, are almost the sole objects that
claim the homage of the Hindus in the Puranas; departing from the domestic and
elemental ritual of the Vedas, and exhibiting a sectorial fervour and
exclusiveness not traceable in the Ramayana, and only to a qualified extent in
the Mahabharata. They are no longer authorities for Hindu belief as a whole:
they are special guides for separate and sometimes conflicting branches of it,
compiled for the evident purpose of promoting the preferential, or in some
cases the sole, worship of Vishnu or of S'iva.
That
the Puranas always bore the character here given of them, may admit of
reasonable doubt; that it correctly applies to them as they now are met with,
the following pages will irrefragably substantiate. It is possible, however,
that there may have been an earlier class of Puranas, of which those we now
have are but the partial and adulterated representatives. The identity of the
legends in many of them, and still more the identity of the words--for in
several of them long passages are literally the same--is a sufficient proof
that in all such cases they must be copied either from some other similar work,
or from a common and prior original. It is not unusual also for a fact to be
stated upon the authority of an 'old stanza,' which is cited accordingly;
shewing the existence of an earlier source of information: and in very many instances’
legends are alluded to, not told; evincing acquaintance with their prior
narration somewhere else. The name itself, Purana, which implies 'old,'
indicates the object of the compilation to be the preservation of ancient
traditions, a purpose in the present condition of the Puranas very imperfectly
fulfilled. Whatever weight may be attached to these considerations, there is no
disputing evidence to the like effect afforded by other and unquestionable
authority. The description given by Mr. Colebrooke [*8] of the contents of a
Purana is taken from Sanskrit writers. The Lexicon of Amara Sinha gives as a synonym
of Purana, Pancha-lakshanam, 'that which has five characteristic topics:' and
there is no difference of opinion amongst the scholiasts as to what these are. They are, as Mr. Colebrooke
mentions, 1. Primary creation, or cosmogony; Secondary creation, or the
destruction and renovation of worlds, including chronology; Genealogy of gods
and patriarchs; Reigns of the Manus, or periods called Manvantaras; and.
History, or such particulars as have been preserved of the princes of the solar
and lunar races, and of their descendants to modern times. Such, at any rate,
were the constituent and characteristic portions of a Purana in the days of
Amara Sinha, fifty-six years before the Christian era; and if the Puranas had
undergone no change since his time, such we should expect to find them still.
Do they conform to this description? Not exactly in any one instance: to some
of them it is utterly inapplicable; to others it only partially applies. There
is not one to which it belongs so entirely as to the Vishnu Purana, and it is
one of the circumstances which gives to this work a more authentic character
than most of its fellows can pretend to. Yet even in this instance we have a
book upon the institutes of society and obsequie rites interposed between the Manvantaras
and the genealogies of princes, and a life of Krishna separating the latter
from an account of the end of the world, besides the insertion of various
legends of a manifestly popular and sectorial character. No doubt many of the
Puranas, as they now are, correspond with the view which Col. Vans Kennedy
takes of their purport. "I cannot discover in them," he remarks,
"any other object than that of religious instruction." The
description of the earth and of the planetary system, and the lists of royal
races which occur in them, he asserts to be "evidently extraneous, and not
essential circumstances, as they are entirely omitted in some Puranas, and very
concisely illustrated in others; while, on the contrary, in all the Puranas
some or other of the leading principles, rites, and observances of the Hindu
religion are fully dwelt upon, and illustrated either by suitable legends or by prescribing the ceremonies to be
practised, and the prayers and invocations to be employed, in the worship of
different deities," Now, however accurate this description may be of the
Puranas as they are, it is clear that it does not apply to what they were when
they were synonymously designated as Pancha-lakshanas, or 'treatises on five
topics;' not one of which five is ever specified by text or comment to be
"religious instruction." In the knowledge of Amara Sinha the lists of
princes were not extraneous and unessential, and their being now so considered
by a writer so well acquainted with the contents of the Puranas as Col. Vans
Kennedy is a decisive proof that since the days of the lexicographer they have
undergone some material alteration, and that we have not at present the same
works in all respects that were current under the denomination of Puranas in
the century prior to Christianity.
The
inference deduced from the discrepancy between the actual form and the older
definition of a Purana, unfavourable to the antiquity of the extant works
generally, is converted into certainty when we come to examine them in detail;
for although they have no dates attached to them, yet circumstances are
sometimes mentioned or alluded to, or references to authorities are made, or
legends are narrated, or places are particularized, of which the comparatively
recent date is indisputable, and which enforce a corresponding reduction of the
antiquity of the work in which they are discovered. At the same time they may
be acquitted of subservience to any but sectarial imposture. They were pious
frauds for temporary purposes: they never emanated from any impossible
combination of the Brahmans to fabricate for the antiquity of the entire Hindu
system any claims which it cannot fully support. A very great portion of the
contents of many, some portion of the contents of all, is genuine and old. The sectarial
interpolation or embellishment is always sufficiently palpable to be set aside,
without injury to the more authentic and primitive material; and the Puranas,
although they belong especially to that stage of the Hindu religion in which
faith in some one divinity was the prevailing principle, are also a valuable
record of the form of Hindu belief which came next in order to that of the Vedas; which grafted
hero-worship upon the simpler ritual of the latter; and which had been adopted,
and was extensively, perhaps universally established in India at the time of
the Greek invasion. The Hercules of the Greek writers was indubitably the
Balarama of the Hindus; and their notices of Mathura on the Jumna, and of the
kingdom of the Suraseni and the Pandaean country, evidence the prior currency
of the traditions which constitute the argument of the Mahabharata, and which
are constantly repeated in the Puranas, relating to the Pandava and Yadava
races, to Krishna and his contemporary heroes, and to the dynasties of the
solar and lunar kings.
The
theogony and cosmogony of the Puranas may probably be traced to the Vedas. They
are not, as far as is yet known, described in detail in those works, but they
are frequently alluded to in a strain more or less mystical and obscure, which
indicates acquaintance with their existence, and which seems to have supplied
the Puranas with the groundwork of their systems. The scheme of primary or
elementary creation they borrow from the Sankhya philosophy, which is probably
one of the oldest forms of speculation on man and nature amongst the Hindus.
Agreeably, however, to that part of the Pauranik character which there is
reason to suspect of later origin, their inculcation of the worship of a
favourite deity, they combine the interposition of a creator with the
independent evolution of matter in a somewhat contradictory and unintelligible
style. It is evident too that their accounts of secondary creation, or the
developement of the existing forms of things, and the disposition of the
universe, are derived from several and different sources; and it appears very
likely that they are to be accused of some of the incongruities and absurdities
by which the narrative is disfigured, in consequence of having attempted to assign
reality and significancy to what was merely metaphor or mysticism. There is,
however, amidst the unnecessary complexity of the description, a general
agreement amongst them as to the origin of things, and their final
distribution; and in many of the circumstances there is a striking concurrence
with the ideas which seem to have pervaded the whole of the ancient world, and
which we may therefore believe to be faithfully represented in the Puranas.
The
Pantheism of the Puranas is one of their invariable characteristics, although
the particular divinity, who is all things, from whom all things proceed, and
to whom all things return, be diversified according to their individual
sectarial bias. They seem to have derived the notion from the Vedas: but in
them the one universal Being is of a higher order than a personification of
attributes or elements, and, however imperfectly conceived, or unworthily
described, is God. In the Puranas the one only Supreme Being is supposed to be
manifest in the person of S'iva or Vishnu, either in the way of illusion or in
sport; and one or other of these divinities is therefore also the cause of all
that is, is himself all that exists. The identity of God and nature is not a
new notion; it was very general in the speculations of antiquity, but it
assumed a new vigour in the early ages of Christianity, and was carried to an
equal pitch of extravagance by the Platonic Christians as by the S'aiva or
Vaishnava Hindus. It seems not impossible that there was some communication
between them. We know that there was an active communication between India and
the Red sea in the early ages of the Christian era, and that doctrines, as well
as articles of merchandise, were brought to Alexandria from the former.
Epiphanius and Eusebius accuse
Scythianus of having imported from India, in the second century, books on
magic, and heretical notions leading to Manichaeism; and it was at the same
period that Ammonius instituted the sect of the new Platonists at Alexandria. The
basis of his heresy was, that true philosophy derived its origin from the
eastern nations: his doctrine of the identity of God and the universe is that
of the Vedas and Puranas; and the practices he enjoined, as well as their
object, were precisely those described in several of the Puranas under the name
of Yoga. His disciples were taught "to extenuate by mortification and
contemplation the bodily restraints upon the immortal spirit, so that in this
life they might enjoy communion with the Supreme Being, and ascend after death
to the universal Parent [*13]." That these are Hindu tenets the following
pages will testify; and by the admission of their Alexandrian teacher, they originated in India. The
importation was perhaps not wholly unrequited; the loan may not have been left
unpaid. It is not impossible that the Hindu doctrines received fresh animation
from their adoption by the successors of Ammonius, and especially by the
mystics, who may have prompted, as well as employed, the expressions of the
Puranas. Anquetil du Perron has given, in the introduction to his translation
of the 'Oupnekhat,' several hymns by Synesius, a bishop of the beginning of the
fifth century, which may serve as parallels to many of the hymns and prayers addressed
to Vishnu in the Vishnu Purana.
But
the ascription to individual and personal deities of the attributes of the one
universal and spiritual Supreme Being, is an indication of a later date than
the Vedas certainly, and apparently also than the Ramayana, where Rama,
although an incarnation of Vishnu, commonly appears in his human character
alone. There is something of the kind in the Mahabharata in respect to Krishna,
especially in the philosophical episode known as the Bhagavad Gita. In other places
the divine nature of Krishna is less decidedly affirmed; in some it is disputed
or denied; and in most of the situations in which he is exhibited in action, it
is as a prince and warrior, not as a divinity. He exercises no superhuman
faculties in the defence of himself or his friends, or in the defeat and
destruction of his foes. The Mahabharata, however, is evidently a work of
various periods, and requires to be read throughout carefully and critically
before its weight as an authority can be accurately appreciated. As it is now
in type [*16]--thanks to the public spirit of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,
and their secretary Mr. J. Prinsep--it will not be long before the Sanscrit
scholars of the continent will accurately appreciate its value.
Date
of the Puranas
The
Puranas are also works of evidently different ages, and have been compiled
under different circumstances, the precise nature of which we can but
imperfectly conjecture from internal evidence, and from what we know of the
history of religious opinion in India. It is highly probable, that of the
present popular forms of the Hindu religion, none assumed their actual state
earlier than the time of S'ankara Acharya, the great S'aiva reformer, who
flourished, in all likelihood, in the eighth or ninth century. Of the Vaishnava
teachers, Ramanuja dates in the twelfth century, Madhwacharya in the
thirteenth, and Vallabha in the sixteenth; and the Puranas seem to have
accompanied or followed their innovations, being obviously intended to advocate
the doctrines they taught. This is to assign to some of them a very modern
date, it is true; but I cannot think that a higher can with justice be ascribed
to them. This, however, applies to some only out of the number, as I shall
presently proceed to specify.
Another
evidence of a comparatively modern date must be admitted in those chapters of
the Puranas which, assuming a prophetic tone, foretell what dynasties of kings
will reign in the Kali age. These chapters, it is true, are found but in four of
the Puranas, but they are conclusive in bringing down the date of those four to
a period considerably subsequent to Christianity. It is also to be remarked,
that the Vayu, Vishnu, Bhagavata, and Matsya Puranas, in which these
particulars are foretold, have in all other respects the character of as great
antiquity as any works of their class.
Form
of the Puranas
The
invariable form of the Puranas is that of a dialogue, in which some person
relates its contents in reply to the inquiries of another. This dialogue is
interwoven with others, which are repeated as having been held on other
occasions between different individuals, in consequence of similar questions
having been asked. The immediate narrator is commonly, though not constantly,
Lomaharshana or Romaharshana, the disciple of Vyasa, who is supposed to
communicate what was imparted to him by his preceptor, as he had heard it from
some other sage. Vyasa, as will be seen in the body of the work [*19], is a
generic title, meaning an 'arranger' or 'compiler.' It is in this age applied
to Krishna Dwaipayana, the son of Paras'ara, who is said to have taught the
Vedas and Puranas to various disciples, but who appears to have been the head
of a college or school, under whom various learned men gave to the sacred
literature of the Hindus the form in which it now presents itself. In this task
the disciples, as they are termed, of Vyasa were rather his colleagues and
coadjutors, for they were already conversant with what he is fabled to have
taught them [*20]; and amongst them, Lomaharshana represents the class of
persons who were especially charged with the record of political and temporal
events. He is called Suta, as if it was a proper name; but it is more correctly
a title; and Lomaharshana was 'a Suta,' that is, a bard or panegyrist, who was
created, according to our text [*21], to celebrate the exploits of princes; and
who, according to the Vayu and Padma Puranas, has a right by birth and
profession to narrate the Puranas, in preference even to the Brahmans [*22]. It
is not unlikely therefore that we are to understand, by his being represented
as the disciple of Vyasa, the institution of some attempt, made under the
direction of the latter, to collect from the heralds and annalists of his day
the scattered traditions which they had imperfectly preserved; and hence the
consequent appropriation of the Puranas, in a great measure, to the genealogies
of regal dynasties, and descriptions of the universe. However this may be, the
machinery has been but loosely adhered to, and many of the Patinas, like the
Vishnu, are referred to a different narrator.
An
account is given in the following work of a series of Pauranik compilations, of
which in their present form no vestige appears. Lomaharshana is said to have
had six disciples, three of whom composed as many fundamental Sanhitas, whilst
he himself compiled a fourth. By a Sanhita is generally understood a
'collection' or 'compilation.' The Sanhitas of the Vedas are collections of
hymns and prayers belonging to them, arranged according to the judgment of some
individual sage, who is therefore looked upon as the originator and teacher of
each. The Sanhitas of the Puranas, then, should be analogous compilations,
attributed respectively to Mitrayu, S'ans'apayana, Akritavrana, and
Romaharshana: no such Pauranik Sanhitas are now known, The substance of the
four is said to be collected in the Vishnu Purana, which is also, in another
place [*24], itself called a Sanhita: but such compilations have not, as far as
inquiry has yet proceeded, been discovered. The specification may be accepted
as an indication of the Puranas having existed in some other form, in which
they are no longer met with; although it does not appear that the arrangement
was incompatible with their existence as separate works, for the Vishnu Purana,
which is our authority for the four Sanhitas, gives us also the usual
enumeration of the several Puranas.
Classification
of the Puranas
There
is another classification of the Puranas alluded to in the Matsya Purana, and
specified by the Padma Purana, but more fully. It is not undeserving of notice,
as it expresses the opinion which native writers entertain of the scope of the
Puranas, and of their recognising the subservience of these works to the
dissemination of sectarian principles.. Thus it is said in the Uttara Khanda of
the Padma, that the Puranas, as well as other works, are divided into three
classes, according to the qualities which prevail in them. Thus the Vishnu,
Naradiya, Bhagavata, Garuda, Padma, and Varaha Puranas, are Satwika, or pure,
from the predominance in them of the Satwa quality, or that of goodness and
purity. They are, in fact, Vaishnava Puranas. The Matsya, Kurma, Linga, S'iva,
Skanda, and Agni Puranas, are Tamasa, or Puranas of darkness, from the
prevalence of the quality of Tamas, 'ignorance,' 'gloom.' They are indisputably
S'aiva Puranas. The third series, comprising the Brahmanda, Brahma-vaivartta,
Markandeya, Bhavishya, Vamana, and Brahma Puranas, are designated as Rajasa,
'passionate,' from Rajas, the property of passion, which they are supposed to represent.
The Matsya does not specify which are the Puranas that come under these
designations, but remarks that those in which the Mahatmya of Hari or Vishnu
prevails are Satwika; those in which the legends of Agni or S'iva predominate
are Tamasa; and those which dwells most on the stories of Brahma are Rajasa. I
have elsewhere stated, that I considered the Rajasa Puranas to lean to the
Sakta division of the Hindus, the worshippers of S'akti, or the female
principle; founding this opinion on the character of the legends which some of
them contain, such as the Durga Mahatmya, or celebrated legend on which the
worship of Durga or Kali is especially founded, which is a principal episode of
the Markandeya. The Brahma-vaivartta also devotes the greatest portion of its
chapters to the celebration of Radha, the mistress of Krishna, and other female
divinities. Col. Vans Kennedy, however, objects to the application of the term
Sakta to this last division of the Puranas, the worship of S'akti being the especial
object of a different class of works, the Tantras, and no such form of worship
being particularly inculcated in the Brahma Purana. This last argument is of
weight in regard to the particular instance specified, and the designation of
S'akti may not be correctly applicable to the whole class, although it is to
some of the series; for there is no incompatibility in the advocacy of a
Tantrika modification of the Hindu religion by any Purana, and it has
unquestionably been practised in works known as Upa-puranas. The proper
appropriation of the third class of the Puranas, according to the Padma Purana,
appears to be to the worship of Krishna, not in the character in which he is
represented in the Vishnu and Bhagavata Puranas, in which the incidents of his
boyhood are only a portion of his biography, and in which the human character
largely participates, at least in his riper years, but as the infant Krishna,
Govinda, Bala Gopala, the sojourner in Vrindavan, the companion of the cowherds
and milkmaids, the lover of Radha, or as the juvenile master of the universe,
Jagannatha. The term Rajasa, implying the animation of passion, and enjoyment
of sensual delights, is applicable, not only to the character of the youthful
divinity, but to those with whom his adoration in these forms seems to have
originated, the Gosains of Gokul and Bengal, the followers and descendants of
Vallabha and Chaitanya, the priests and proprietors of Jagannath and
S'rinath-dwar, who lead a life of affluence and indulgence, and vindicate, both
by precept and practice, the reasonableness of the Rajasa property, and the
congruity of temporal enjoyment with the duties of religion.
The
Puranas are uniformly stated to be eighteen in number. It is said that there
are also eighteen Upa-puranas, or minor Puranas; but the names of only a few of
these are specified in the least exceptionable authorities, and the greater
number of the works is not procurable. With regard to the eighteen Puranas,
there is a peculiarity in their specification, which is proof of an
interference with the integrity of the text, in some of them at least; for each
of them specifies the names of the whole eighteen. Now the list could not have
been complete whilst the work that gives it was unfinished, and in one only
therefore, the last of the series, have we a right to look for it. As however
there are more last words than one, it is evident that the names must have been
inserted in all except one after the whole were completed: which of the eighteen
is the exception, and truly the last, there is no clue to discover, and the
specification is probably an interpolation in most, if not in all.
The
names that are specified are commonly the same, and are as follows: 1. Brahma,
2. Padma, 3. Vaishnava, 4. S'aiva, 5. Bhagavata, 6. Narada, 7. Markanda, 8.
Agneya, 9. Bhavishya, 10. Brahma-vaivartta, 11. Lainga, 12. Varaha, 13. Skanda,
14. Vamana,. Kaurma, 16. Matsya, 17. Garuda, 18. Brahmanda. This is from the
twelfth book of the Bhagavata, and is the same as occurs in the Vishnu. In
other authorities there are a few variations. The list of the K.urma P. omits
the Agni Purana, and substitutes the Vayu. The Agni leaves out the S'aiva, and
inserts the Vayu. The Varaha omits the Garuda and Brahmanda, and inserts the
Vayu and Narasinha: in this last it is singular. The Markandeya agrees with the
Vishnu and Bhagavata in omitting the Vayu. The Matsya, like the Agni, leaves
out the S'aiva.
Some
of the Puranas, as the Agni, Matsya, Bhagavata, and Padma, also particularize
the number of stanzas which each of the eighteen contains. In one or two
instances they disagree, but in general they concur. The aggregate is stated at
400,000 slokas, or 1,600,000 lines. These are fabled to be but an abridgment,
the whole amount being a krore, or ten million of stanzas, or even a thousand million.
If all the fragmentary portions claiming in various parts of India to belong to
the Puranas were admitted, their extent would much exceed the lesser, though it
would not reach the larger enumeration. The former is, however, as I have
elsewhere stated, a quantity that an individual European scholar could scarcely
expect to peruse with due care and attention, unless his whole time were
devoted exclusively for many years to the task. Yet without some such labour
being achieved, it was clear, from the crudity and inexactness of all that had
been hitherto published on the subject, with one exception, that sound views on
the subject of Hindu mythology and tradition were not to be expected.
Circumstances, which I have already explained in the paper in the Journal of
the Royal Asiatic Society referred to above, enabled me to avail myself of
competent assistance, by which I made a minute abstract of most of the Puranas.
In course of time I hope to place a tolerably copious and connected analysis of
the whole eighteen before Oriental scholars, and in the mean while offer a
brief notice of their several contents.
In
general the enumeration of the Puranas is a simple nomenclature, with the
addition in some cases of the number of verses; but to these the Matsya Purana
joins the mention of one or two circumstances peculiar to each, which, although
scanty, are of value, as offering means of identifying the copies of the
Puranas now found with those to which the Matsya refers, or of discovering a
difference between the present and the past. I shall therefore prefix the
passage descriptive of each Purana from the Matsya. It is necessary to remark,
however, that in the comparison instituted between that description and the
Purana as it exists, I necessarily refer to the copy or copies which I employed
for the purpose of examination and analysis, and which were procured with some
trouble and cost in Benares and Calcutta. In some instances my manuscripts have
been collated with others from different parts of India, and the result has
shewn, that, with regard at least to the Brahma, Vishnu, Vayu, Matsya, Padma,
Bhagavata, and Kurma Puranas, the same works, in all essential respects, are
generally current under the same appellations. Whether this is invariably the
case may be doubted, and farther inquiry may possibly shew that I have been
obliged to content myself with mutilated or unauthentic works. It is with this
reservation, therefore, that I must be understood to speak of the concurrence
or disagreement of any Purana with the notice of it which the Matsya P. has
preserved.
1.
The Brahma Purana
1.
Brahma Purana. "That, the whole of which was formerly repeated by Brahma
to Marichi, is called the Brahma Purana, and contains ten thousand stanzas
[*33]." In all the lists of the Puranas, the Brahma is placed at the head
of the series, and is thence sometimes also entitled the Adi or 'first' Purana.
It is also designated as the Saura, as it is in great part appropriated to the
worship of Surya, 'the sun.' There are, however, works bearing these names
which belong to the class of Upa-puranas, and which are not to be confounded
with the Brahma. It is usually said, as above, to contain ten thousand slokas;
but the number actually occurring is between seven and eight thousand. There is
a supplementary or concluding section called the Brahmottara Purana, and which
is different from a portion of the Skanda called the Brahmottara Khanda, which
contains about three thousand stanzas more; but there is every reason to
conclude that this is a distinct and unconnected work.
The
immediate narrator of the Brahma Purana is Lomaharshana, who communicates it to
the Rishis or sages assembled at Naimisharanya, as it was originally revealed
by Brahma, not to Marichi, as the Matsya affirms, but to Daksha, another of the
patriarchs: hence its denomination of the Brahma Purana.
The
early chapters of this work give a description of the creation, an account of
the Manwantaras, and the history of the solar and lunar dynasties to the time
of Krishna, in a summary manner, and in words which are common to it and
several other Puranas: a brief description of the universe succeeds; and then
come a number of chapters relating to the holiness of Orissa, with its temples
and sacred groves dedicated to the sun, to S'iva, and Jagannath, the latter
especially. These chapters are characteristic of this Purana, and shew its main
object to be the promotion of the worship of Krishna as Jagannath [*34]. To
these particulars succeeds a life of Krishna, which is word for word the same
as that of the Vishnu Purana; and the compilation terminates with a particular
detail of the mode in which Yoga, or contemplative devotion, the object of
which is still Vishnu, is to be performed. There is little in this which
corresponds with the definition of a Pancha-lakshana Purana; and the mention of
the temples of Orissa, the date of the original construction of which is
recorded [*35], shews that it could not have been compiled earlier than the
thirteenth or fourteenth century.
The
Uttara Khanda of the Brahma P. bears still more entirely the character of a
Mahatmya, or local legend, being intended to celebrate the sanctity of the
Balaja river, conjectured to be the same as the Banas in Marwar. There is no
clue to its date, but it is clearly modern, grafting personages and fictions of
its own invention on a few hints from older authorities.
2.
The Padma Purana
2.
Padma Purana. "That which contains an account of the period when the world
was a golden lotus (padma), and of all the occurrences of that time, is
therefore called the Padma by the wise: it contains fifty-five thousand stanzas
[*37]." The second Purana in the usual lists is always the Padma, a very
voluminous work, containing, according to its own statement, as well as that of
other authorities, fifty-five thousand slokas; an amount not far from the
truth. These are divided amongst five books, or Khandas; 1. the Srishti Khanda,
or section on creation; 2. the Bhumi Khanda, description of the earth; 3. the
Swarga Khanda, chapter on heaven; 4. Patala Khanda, chapter on the regions
below the earth; and 5. the Uttara Khanda, last or supplementary chapter. There
is also current a sixth division, the Kriya Yoga Sara, a treatise on the
practice of devotion.
The
denominations of these divisions of the Padma P. convey but an imperfect and
partial notion of their contents. In the first, or section which treats of
creation, the narrator is Ugras'ravas the Suta, the son of Lomaharshana, who is
sent by his father to the Rishis at Naimisharanya to communicate to them the
Purana, which, from its containing an account of the lotus (padma), in which
Brahma appeared at creation, is termed the Padma or Padma Purana. The Suta
repeats what was originally communicated by Brahma to Pulastya, and by him to
Bhishma. The early chapters narrate the cosmogony, and the genealogy of the
patriarchal families, much in the same style, and often in the same words, as
the Vishnu; and short accounts of the Manwantaras and regal dynasties: but
these, which are legitimate Pauranik matters, soon make way for new and
unauthentic inventions, illustrative of the virtues of the lake of Pushkara, or
Pokher in Ajmir, as a place of pilgrimage.
The
Bhumi Khanda, or section of the earth, defers any description of the earth
until near its close, filling up one hundred and twenty-seven chapters with
legends of a very mixed description, some ancient and common to other Puranas,
but the greater part peculiar to itself, illustrative of Tirthas either
figuratively so termed--as a wife, a parent, or a Guru, considered as a sacred
object--or places to which actual pilgrimage should be performed.
The
Swarga Khanda describes in the first chapters the relative positions of the
Lokas or spheres above the earth, placing above all Vaikuntha, the sphere of
Vishnu; an addition which is not warranted by what appears to be the oldest
cosmology [*38]. Miscellaneous notices of some of the most celebrated princes
then succeed, conformably to the usual narratives; and these are followed by
rules of conduct for the several castes, and at different stages of life. The
rest of the book is occupied by legends of a diversified description,
introduced without much method or contrivance; a few of which, as Daksha's
sacrifice, are of ancient date, but of which the most are original and modern.
The
Patala Khanda devotes a brief introduction to the description of Patala, the
regions of the snake-gods; but the name of Rama having been mentioned, S'esha,
who has succeeded Pulastya as spokesman, proceeds to narrate the history of
Rama, his descent and his posterity; in which the compiler seems to have taken
the poem of Kalidas'a, the Raghu Vans'a, for his chief authority. An
originality of addition may be suspected, however, in the adventures of the
horse destined by Rama for an As'wamedha, which form the subject of a great
many chapters. When about to be sacrificed, the horse turns out to be a
Brahman, condemned by an imprecation of Durvasas, a sage, to assume the equine
nature, and who, by having been sanctified by connexion with Rama, is released
from his metamorphosis, and dispatched as a spirit of light to heaven. This
piece of Vaishnava fiction is followed by praises of the S'ri Bhagavata, an
account of Krishna's juvenilities, and the merits of worshipping Vishnu. These
accounts are communicated through a machinery borrowed from the Tantras: they
are told by Sadas'iva to Parvati, the ordinary interlocutors of Tantrika
compositions.
The
Uttara Khanda is a most voluminous aggregation of very heterogeneous matters,
but it is consistent in adopting a decidedly Vaishnava tone, and admitting no
compromise with any other form of faith. The chief subjects are first discussed
in a dialogue between king Dilipa and the Muni Vas'ishtha; such as the merits
of bathing in the month of Magha, and the potency of the Mantra or prayer
addressed to Lakshmi Narayana. But the nature of Bhakti, faith in Vishnu--the
use of Vaishnava marks on the body--the legends of Vishnu's Avataras, and
especially of Rama--and the construction of images of Vishnu--are too important
to be left to mortal discretion: they are explained by S'iva to Parvati, and
wound up by the adoration of Vishnu by those divinities. The dialogue then
reverts to the king and the sage; and the latter states why Vishnu is the only
one of the triad entitled to respect; S'iva being licentious, Brahma arrogant,
and Vishnu alone pure. Vas'ishtha then repeats, after S'iva, the Mahatmya of
the Bhagavad Gita; the merit of each book of which is illustrated by legends of
the good consequences to individuals from perusing or hearing it. Other
Vaishnava Mahatmyas occupy considerable portions of this Khanda, especially the
Kartika Mahatmya, or holiness of the month Kartika, illustrated as usual by
stories, a few of which are of an early origin, but the greater part modern,
and peculiar to this Purana.
The
Kriya Yoga Sara is repeated by Suta to the Rishis, after Vyasa's communication
of it to Jaimini, in answer to an inquiry how religious merit might be secured
in the Kali age, in which men have become incapable of the penances and
abstraction by which final liberation was formerly to be attained. The answer
is, of course, that which is intimated in the last hook of the Vishnu
Purana--personal devotion to Vishnu: thinking of him, repeating his names,
wearing his marks, worshipping in his temples, are a full substitute for all
other acts of moral or devotional or contemplative merit.
The
different portions of the Padma Purana are in all probability as many different
works, neither of which approaches to the original definition of a Purana.
There may be some connexion between the three first portions, at least as to
time; but there is no reason to consider them as of high antiquity. They
specify the Jains both by name and practices.; they talk of Mlechchhas,
'barbarians,' flourishing in India; they commend the use of the frontal and
other Vaishnava marks; and they notice other subjects which, like these, are of
no remote origin. The Patala Khanda dwells copiously upon the Bhagavata, and is
consequently posterior to it. The Uttara Khanda is intolerantly Vaishnava, and
is therefore unquestionably modern. It enjoins the veneration of the Salagram
stone and Tulasi plant, the use of the Tapta-mudra, or stamping with a hot iron
the name of Vishnu on the skin, and a variety of practices and observances
undoubtedly no part of the original system. It speaks of the shrines of
S'ri-rangam and Venkatadri in the Dekhin, temples that have no pretension to
remote antiquity; and it names Haripur on the Tungabhadra, which is in all
likelihood the city of Vijayanagar, founded in the middle of the fourteenth
century. The Kriya Yoga Sara is equally a modern, and apparently a Bengali
composition. No portion of the Padma Purana is probably older than the twelfth
century, and the last parts may be as recent as the fifteenth or sixteenth.
3.
The Vishnu Purana
Vishnu Purana. "That in which Paras'ara,
beginning with the events of the Varaha Kalpa, expounds all duties, is called
the Vaishnava; and the learned know its extent to be twenty-three thousand
stanzas [*41]." The third Purana of the lists is that which has been
selected for translation, the Vishnu. It is unnecessary therefore to offer any
general summary of its contents, and it will be convenient to reserve any
remarks upon its character and probable antiquity for a subsequent page. It may
here be observed, however, that the actual number of verses contained in it
falls far short of the enumeration of the Matsya, with which the Bhagavata
concurs. Its actual contents are not seven thousand stanzas. All the copies,
and in this instance they are not fewer than seven in number, procured both in
the east and in the west of India, agree; and there is no appearance of any
part being wanting. There is a beginning, a middle, and an end, in both text
and comment; and the work as it stands is incontestably entire. How is the
discrepancy to be explained?
4.
The Vayaviya Purana
4.
"The Purana in which Vayu has declared the laws of duty, in connexion with
the Sweta Kalpa, and which comprises the Mahatmya of Rudra, is the Vayaviya
Purana: it contains twenty-four thousand verses." The S'iva or S'aiva
Purana is, as above remarked, omitted in some of the lists; and in general,
when that is the case, it is replaced by the Vayu or Vayaviya. When the S'iva
is specified, as in the Bhagavata, then the Vayu is omitted; intimating the
possible identity of these two works. This indeed is confirmed by the Matsya,
which describes the Vayaviya Purana as characterised by its account of the
greatness of Rudra or Siva; and Balambhatta mentions that the Vayaviya is also
called the S'aiva, though, according to some, the latter is the name of an
Upa-purana. Col. Vans Kennedy observes, that in the west of India the S'aiva is
commonly considered to be an Upa or 'minor' Purana].
Another
proof that the same work is intended by the authorities here followed, the
Bhagavata and Matsya, under different appellations, is their concurrence in the
extent of the work, each specifying its verses to be twenty-four thousand. A
copy of the S'iva Purana, of which an index and analysis have been prepared,
does not contain more than about seven thousand: it cannot therefore be the
S'iva Purana of the Bhagavata; and we may safely consider that to be the same
as the Vayaviya of the Matsya.
The
Vayu Purana is narrated by Suta to the Rishis at Naimisharanya, as it was
formerly told at the same place to similar persons by Vayu; a repetition of
circumstances not uncharacteristic of the inartificial style of this Purana. It
is divided into four Padas, termed severally Prakriya, Upodghata, Anushanga,
and Upasanhara; a classification peculiar to this work. These are preceded by
an index, or heads of chapters, in the manner of the Mahabharata and Ramayana;
another peculiarity.
The
Prakriya portion contains but a few chapters, and treats chiefly of elemental
creation, and the first evolutions of beings, to the same purport as the
Vishnu, but in a more obscure and unmethodical style. The Upodghata then
continues the subject of creation, and describes the various Kalpas or periods
during which the world has existed; a greater number of which is specified by
the S'aiva than by the Vaishnava Puranas. Thirty-three are here described, the
last of which is the Sweta or 'white' Kalpa, from S'iva's being born in it of a
white complexion. The genealogies of the patriarchs, the description of the
universe, and the incidents of the first six Manwantaras, are all treated of in
this part of the work; but they are intermixed with legends and praises of
S'iva, as the sacrifice of Daksha, the Mahes'wara Mahatmya, the Nilakantha
Stotra, and others. The genealogies, although in the main the same as those in
the Vaishnava Puranas, present some variations. A long account of the Pitris or
progenitors is also peculiar to this Purana; as are stories of some of the most
celebrated Rishis, who were engaged in the distribution of the Vedas.
The
third division commences with an account of the seven Rishis and their
descendants, and describes the origin of the different classes of creatures
from the daughters of Daksha, with a profuse copiousness of nomenclature, not
found in any other Purana. With exception of the greater minuteness of detail,
the particulars agree with those of the Vishnu P. A chapter then occurs on the
worship of the Pitris; another on Tirthas, or places sacred to them; and
several on the performance of Sraddhas, constituting the Sraddha Kalpa. After
this, comes a full account of the solar and lunar dynasties, forming a parallel
to that in the following pages, with this difference, that it is throughout in
verse, whilst that of our text, as noticed in its place, is chiefly in prose.
It is extended also by the insertion of detailed accounts of various incidents,
briefly noticed in the Vishnu, though derived apparently from a common
original. The section terminates with similar accounts of future kings, and the
same chronological calculations, that are found in the Vishnu.
The
last portion, the Upasanhara, describes briefly the future Manwantaras, the
measures of space and time, the end of the world, the efficacy of Yoga, and the
glories of S'iva-pura, or the dwelling of S'iva, with whom the Yogi is to be
united. The manuscript concludes with a different history of the successive
teachers of the Vayu Purana, tracing them from Brahma to Vayu, from Vayu to
Vrihaspati, and from him, through various deities and sages, to Dwaipayana and
S'uta.
The
account given of this Purana in the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal
was limited to something less than half the work, as I had not then been able
to procure a larger portion. I have now a more complete one of my own, and
there are several copies in the East India Company's library of the like
extent. One, presented by His Highness the Guicowar, is dated Samvat 1540, or
A. D. 1483, and is evidently as old as it professes to be. The examination I
have made of the work confirms the view I formerly took of it; and from the
internal evidence it affords, it may perhaps be regarded as one of the oldest
and most authentic specimens extant of a primitive Purana.
It
appears, however, that we have not yet a copy of the entire Vayu Purana. The
extent of it, as mentioned above, should be twenty-four thousand verses. The
Guicowar MS. has but twelve thousand, and is denominated the Purvarddha, or
first portion. My copy is of the like extent. The index also spews that several
subjects remain untold; as, subsequently to the description of the sphere of
S'iva, and the periodical dissolution of the world, the work is said to contain
an account of a succeeding creation, and of various events that occurred in it,
as the birth of several celebrated Rishis, including that of Vyasa, and a
description of his distribution of the Vedas; an account of the enmity between
Vas'ishtha and Viswamitra; and a Naimisharanya Mahatmya. These topics are,
however, of minor importance, and can scarcely carry the Purana to the whole
extent of the verses which it is said to contain. If the number is accurate,
the index must still omit a considerable portion of the subsequent contents.
5.
The Bhagavata Purana
5.
S'ri Bhagavata. "That in which ample details of duty are described, and
which opens with (an extract from) the Gayatri; that in which the death of the
Asura Vritra is told, and in which the mortals and immortals of the Saraswata
Kalpa, with the events that then happened to them in the world, are related;
that, is celebrated as the Bhagavata, and consists of eighteen thousand verses
[*46]." The Bhagavata is a work of great celebrity in India, and exercises
a more direct and powerful influence upon the opinions and feelings of the
people than perhaps any other of the Puranas. It is placed the fifth in all the
lists; but the Padma Purana ranks it as the eighteenth, as the extracted
substance of all the rest. According to the usual specification, it consists of
eighteen thousand s'lokas, distributed amongst three hundred and thirty-two
chapters, divided into twelve Skandhas or books. It is named Bhagavata from its
being dedicated to the glorification of Bhagavat or Vishnu.
The
Bhagavata is communicated to the Rishis at Naimisharanya by Suta, as usual; but
he only repeats what was narrated by S'uka, the son of Vyasa, to Parikshit, the
king of Hastinapura, the grandson of Arjuna. Having incurred the imprecation of
a hermit, by which he was sentenced to die of the bite of a venomous snake, at
the expiration of seven days; the king, in preparation for . this event,
repairs to the banks of the Ganges; whither also come the gods and sages, to
witness his death. Amongst the latter is S'uka; and it is in reply to
Parikshit's question, what a man should do who is about to die, that he
narrates the Bhagavata, as he had heard it from Vyasa; for nothing secures
final happiness so certainly, as to die whilst the thoughts are wholly
engrossed by Vishnu.
The
course of the narration opens with a cosmogony, which, although in most
respects similar to that of other Puranas, is more largely intermixed with
allegory and mysticism, and derives its tone more from the Vedanta than the
Sankhya philosophy. The doctrine of active creation by the Supreme, as one with
Vasudeva, is more distinctly asserted, with a more decided enunciation of the
effects being resolvable into Maya, or illusion. There are also doctrinal
peculiarities, highly characteristic of this Purana; amongst which is the
assertion that it was originally communicated by Brahma to Narada, that all men
whatsoever, Hindus of every caste, and even Mlechchhas, outcastes or
barbarians, might learn to have faith in Vasudeva.
In
the third book the interlocutors are changed to Maitreya and Vidura; the former
of whom is the disciple in the Vishnu Purana, the latter was the half-brother
of the Kuru princes. Maitreya, again, gives an account of the Srishti-lila, or sport
of creation, in a strain partly common to the Puranas, partly peculiar;
although he declares he learned it from his teacher Paras'ara, at the desire of
Pulastya [*47]; referring thus to the fabulous origin of the Vishnu Purana, and
furnishing evidence of its priority. Again, however, the authority is changed,
and the narrative is said to have been that which was communicated by S'esha to
the Nagas. The creation of Brahma is then described, and the divisions of time
are explained. A very long and peculiar account is given of the Varaha
incarnation of Vishnu, which is followed by the creation of the Prajapatis and
Swayambhuva, whose daughter Devahuti is married to Karddama Rishi; an incident
peculiar to this work, as is that which follows of the Avatara of Vishnu as
Kapila the son of Karddama and Devahuti, the author of the Sankhya philosophy,
which he expounds, after a Vaishnava fashion, to his mother, in the last nine
chapters of this section.
The
Manwantara of Swayambhuva, and the multiplication of the patriarchal families,
are next described with some peculiarities of nomenclature, which are pointed
out in the notes to the parallel passages of the Vishnu Purana. The traditions
of Dhruva, Vena, Prithu, and other princes of this period, are the other subjects
of the fourth Skandha, and are continued in the fifth to that of the Bharata
who obtained emancipation. The details generally conform to those of the Vishnu
Purana, and the same words are often employed, so that it would he difficult to
determine which work had the best right to them, had not the Bhagavata itself
indicated its obligations to the Vishnu. The remainder of the fifth book is
occupied with the description of the universe, and the same conformity with the
Vishnu continues.
This
is only partially the case with the sixth book, which contains a variety of
legends of a miscellaneous description, intended to illustrate the merit of
worshipping Vishnu: some of them belong to the early stock, but some are
apparently novel. The seventh book is mostly occupied with the legend of
Prahlada. In the eighth we have an account of the remaining Manwantaras; in
which, as happening in the course of them, a variety of ancient legends are
repeated, as the battle between the king of the elephants and an alligator, the
churning of the ocean, and the dwarf and fish Avataras. The ninth book narrates
the dynasties of the Vaivaswata Manwantara, or the princes of the solar and
lunar races to the time of Krishna [*48]. The particulars conform generally
with those recorded in the Vishnu.
The
tenth book is the characteristic part of this Purana, and the portion upon
which its popularity is founded. It is appropriated entirely to the history of
Krishna, which it narrates much in the same manner as the Vishnu, but in more
detail; holding a middle place, however, between it and the extravagant
prolixity with which the Hari Vans'a repeats the story. It is not necessary to
particularize it farther. It has been translated into perhaps all the languages
of India, and is a favourite work with all descriptions of people.
The
eleventh book describes the destruction of the Yadavas, and death of Krishna.
Previous to the latter event, Krishna instructs Uddhava in the performance of
the Yoga; a subject consigned by the Vishnu to the concluding passages. The
narrative is much the same, but something more summary than that of the Vishnu.
The twelfth book continues the lines of the kings of the Kali age prophetically
to a similar period as the Vishnu, and gives a like account of the
deterioration of all things, and their final dissolution. Consistently with the
subject of the Purana, the serpent Takshaka bites Parikshit, and he expires,
and the work should terminate; or the close might be extended to the subsequent
sacrifice of Janamejaya for the destruction of the whole serpent race. There is
a rather awkwardly introduced description, however, of the arrangement of the
Vedas and Puranas by Vyasa, and the legend of Markandeya's interview with the
infant Krishna, during a period of worldly dissolution. We then come to the end
of the Bhagavata, in a series of encomiastic commendations of its own sanctity,
and efficacy to salvation.
Mr.
Colebrooke observes of the Bhagavata Purana, "I am inclined to adopt an
opinion supported by many learned Hindus, who consider the celebrated S'ri
Bhagavata as the work of a grammarian (Vopadeva), supposed to have lived six
hundred years ago." Col. Vans Kennedy considers this an incautious
admission, because "it is unquestionable that the number of the Puranas
has been always held to be eighteen; but in most of the Puranas the names of
the eighteen are enumerated, amongst which the Bhagavata is invariably
included; and consequently if it were composed only six hundred years ago, the
others must be of an equally modern date." Some of them are no doubt more
recent; but, as already remarked, no weight can be attached to the
specification of the eighteen names, for they are always complete; each Purana
enumerates all. Which is the last? which had the opportunity of naming its
seventeen predecessors, and adding itself? The argument proves too much. There
can be little doubt that the list has been inserted upon the authority of
tradition, either by some improving transcriber, or by the compiler of a work
more recent than the eighteen genuine Puranas. The objection is also rebutted
by the assertion, that there was another Purana to which the name applies, and
which is still to be met with, the Devi Bhagavata.
For,
the authenticity of the Bhagavata is one of the few questions affecting their
sacred literature which Hindu writers have ventured to discuss. The occasion is
furnished by the text itself. In the fourth chapter of the first book it is
said that Vyasa arranged the Vedas, and divided them into four; and that he
then compiled the Itihasa and Puranas, as a fifth Veda. The Vedas he gave to
Paila and the rest; the Itihasa and Puranas to Lomaharshana, the father of Suta.
Then reflecting that these works may not be accessible to women, S'udras, and mixed
castes, he composed the Bharata, for the purpose of placing religious knowledge
within their reach. Still he felt dissatisfied, and wandered in much perplexity
along the banks of the Saraswati, where his hermitage was situated, when Narada
paid him a visit. Having confided to him his secret and seemingly causeless
dissatisfaction, Narada suggested that it arose from his not having
sufficiently dwelt, in the works he had finished, upon the merit of worshipping
Vasudeva. Vyasa at once admitted its truth, and found a remedy for his
uneasiness in the composition of the Bhagavata, which he taught to S'uka his
son [*52]. Here therefore is the most positive assertion that the Bhagavata was
composed subsequently to the Puranas, and given to a different pupil, and was
not therefore one of the eighteen of which Romaharshana the Seta was, according
to all concurrent testimonies, the depositary. Still the Bhagavata is named
amongst the eighteen Puranas by the inspired authorities; and how can these
incongruities be reconciled?
The
principal point in dispute seems to have been started by an expression of
S'ridhara Swamin, a commentator on the Bhagavata, who somewhat incautiously
made the remark that there was no reason to suspect that by the term Bhagavata
any other work than the subject of his labours was intended. This was therefore
an admission that some suspicions had been entertained of the correctness of
the nomenclature, and that an opinion had been expressed that the term
belonged, not to the S'ri Bhagavata, but to the Devi Bhagavata; to a S'aiva,
not a Vaishnava, composition. With whom doubts prevailed prior to S'ridhara
Swamin, or by whom they were urged, does not appear; for, as far as we are
aware, no works, anterior to his date, in which they are advanced have been met
with. Subsequently, various tracts have been written on the subject. There are
three in the library of the East India Company; the Durjana Mukha Chapetika, 'A
slap of the face for the vile,' by Ramas'rama; the Durjana Mukha Maha
Chapetika, 'A great slap of the face for the wicked,' by Kas'inath Bhatta; and
the Durjana Mukha Padma Paduka, 'A slipper' for the same part of the same
persons, by a nameless disputant. The first maintains the authenticity of the
Bhagavata; the second asserts that the Devi Bhagavata is the genuine Purana;
and the third replies to the arguments of the first. There is also a work by
Purushottama, entitled 'Thirteen arguments for dispelling all doubts of the
character of the Bhagavata' (Bhagavata swarupa vihsaya s'anka nirasa
trayodasa); whilst Balambhatta, a commentator on the Mitakshara, indulging in a
dissertation on the meaning of the word Purana, adduces reasons for questioning
the inspired origin of this Purana.
The
chief arguments in favour of the authenticity of this Purana are the absence of
any reason why Vopadeva, to whom it is attributed, should not have put his own
name to it; its being included in all lists of the Puranas, sometimes with
circumstances that belong to no other Purana; and its being admitted to be a
Purana, and cited as authority, or made the subject of comment, by writers of
established reputation, of whom S'ankara Acharya is one, and he lived long
before Vopadeva. The reply to the first argument is rather feeble, the
controversialists being unwilling perhaps to admit the real object, the
promotion of new doctrines. It is therefore said that Vyasa was an incarnation
of Narayana, and the purpose was to propitiate his favour. The insertion of a
Bhagavata amongst the eighteen Puranas is acknowledged; but this, it is said,
can be the Devi Bhagavata alone, for the circumstances apply more correctly to
it than to the Vaishnava Bhagavata. Thus a text is quoted by Kas'inath from a
Purana--he does not state which--that says of the Bhagavata that it contains
eighteen thousand verses, twelve books, and three hundred and thirty-two
chapters. Kas'inath asserts that the chapters of the S'ri Bhagavata are three
hundred and thirty-five, and that the numbers apply throughout only to the Devi
Bhagavata. It is also said that the Bhagavata contains an account of the
acquirement of holy knowledge by Hayagriva; the particulars of the Saraswata
Kalpa; a dialogue between Ambarisha and S'uka; and that it commences with the
Gayatri, or at least a citation of it. These all apply to the Devi Bhagavata
alone, except the last; but it also is more true of the S'aiva than of the
Vaishnava work, for the latter has only one word of the Gayatri, dhimahi, 'we meditate;'
whilst the former to dhimahi adds, Ya nah prachodayat, 'who may enlighten us.'
To the third argument it is in the first place objected, that the citation of
the Bhagavata by modern writers is no test of its authenticity; and with regard
to the more ancient commentary of S'ankara Acharya, it is asked, "Where is
it?" Those who advocate the sanctity of the Bhagavata reply, "It was
written in a difficult style, and became obsolete, and is lost." "A
very unsatisfactory plea," retort their opponents, "for we still have
the works of S'ankara, several of which are quite as difficult as any in the
Sanscrit language." The existence of this comment, too, rests upon the
authority of Madhwa or Madhava, who in a commentary of his own asserts that he
has consulted eight others. Now amongst these is one by the monkey Hanuman; and
although a Hindu disputant may believe in the reality of such a composition,
yet we may receive its citation as a proof that Madhwa was not very scrupulous
in the verification of his authorities.
There
are other topics urged in this controversy on both sides, some of which are
simple enough, some are ingenious: but the statement of the text is of itself
sufficient to shew that according to the received opinion of all the
authorities of the priority of the eighteen Puranas to the Bharata, it is
impossible that the S'ri Bhagavata, which is subsequent to the Bharata, should
be of the number; and the evidence of style, the superiority of which to that of
the Puranas in general is admitted by the disputants, is also proof that it is
the work of a different hand. Whether the Devi Bhagavata have a better title to
be considered as an original composition of Vyasa, is equally questionable; but
it cannot be doubted that the S'ri Bhagavata is the product of uninspired
erudition. There does not seem to be any other ground than tradition for
ascribing it to Vopadeva the grammarian; but there is no reason to call the
tradition in question. Vopadeva flourished at the court of Hemadri, Raja of
Devagiri, Deogur or Dowlutabad, and must consequently have lived prior to the
conquest of that principality by the Mohammedans in the fourteenth century. The
date of the twelfth century, commonly assigned to him, is probably correct, and
is that of the Bhagavata Purana.
6.
The Naradiya Purana
6.
Narada or Naradiya Purana. "Where Narada has described the duties which
were observed in the Vrihat Kalpa, that, is called the Naradiya, having
twenty-five thousand stanzas." If the number of verses be here correctly
stated, the Purana has not fallen into my hands. The copy I have analysed
contains not many more than three thousand s'lokas. There is another work,
which might be expected to be of greater extent, the Vrihat Naradiya, or great
Narada Purana; but this, according to the concurrence of three copies in my
possession, and of five others in the Company's library, contains but about
three thousand five hundred verses. It may be doubted, therefore, if the Narada
Purana of the Matsya exists.
According
to the Matsya, the Narada Purana is related by Narada, and gives an account of
the Vrihat Kalpa. The Naradiya Purana is communicated by Narada to the Rishis
at Naimisharanya, on the Gomati river. The Vrihannaradiya is related to the
same persons, at the same place, by Suta, as it was told by Narada to
Sanatkumara. Possibly the term Vrihat may have been suggested by the
specification which is given in the Matsya; but there is no description in it
of any particular Kalpa, or day of Brahma.
From
a cursory examination of these Puranas, it is very evident that they have no
conformity to the definition of a Purana, and that both are sectarial and
modern compilations, intended to support the doctrine of Bhakti, or faith in
Vishnu. With this view they have collected a variety of prayers addressed to
one or other form of that divinity; a number of observances and holidays
connected with his adoration; and different legends, some perhaps of an early,
others of a more recent date, illustrative of the efficacy of devotion to Hari.
Thus in the Narada we have the stories of Dhruva and Prahlada; the latter told
in the words of the Vishnu: whilst the second portion of it is occupied with a
legend of Mohini, the will-born daughter of a king called Rukmangada: beguiled
by whom, the king offers to perform for her whatever she may desire. She calls
upon him either to violate the rule of fasting on the eleventh day of the
fortnight, a day sacred to Vishnu, or to put his son to death; and he kills his
son, as the lesser sin of the two. This shews the spirit of the work. Its date
may also be inferred from its tenor, as such monstrous extravagancies in praise
of Bhakti are certainly of modern origin. One limit it furnishes itself, for it
refers to S'uka and Parikshit, the interlocutors of the Bhagavata, and it is
consequently subsequent to the date of that Purana: it is probably considerably
later, for it affords evidence that it was written after India was in the hands
of the Mohammedans. In the concluding passage it is said, "Let not this
Purana be repeated in the presence of the 'killers of cows' and contemners of
the gods." It is possibly a compilation of the sixteenth or seventeenth
century.
The
Vrihannaradiya is a work of the same tenor and time. It contains little else
than panegyrical prayers addressed to Vishnu, and injunctions to observe
various rites, and keep holy certain seasons, in honour of him. The earlier
legends introduced are the birth of Markandeya, the destruction of Sagara's
sons, and the dwarf Avatara; but they are subservient to the design of the
whole, and are rendered occasions for praising Narayana: others, illustrating
the efficacy of certain Vaishnava observances, are puerile inventions, wholly
foreign to the more ancient system of Pauranik fiction. There is no attempt at
cosmogony, or patriarchal or regal genealogy. It is possible that these topics
may be treated of in the missing stanzas; but it seems more likely that the
Narada Purana of the lists has little in common with the works to which its
name is applied in Bengal and Hindustan.
7.
The Markandeya Purana
7.
Markanda or Markandeya Purana. "That Purana in which, commencing with the
story of the birds that were acquainted with right and wrong, everything is
narrated fully by Markandeya, as it was explained by holy sages in reply to the
question of the Muni, is called the Markandeya, containing nine thousand verses."
This is so called from its being in the first instance narrated by Markandeya
Muni, and in the second place by certain fabulous birds; thus far agreeing with
the account given of it in the Matsya. That, as well as other authorities,
specify it containing nine thousand stanzas; but my copy closes with a verse
affirming that the number of verses recited by the Muni was six thousand nine
hundred; and a copy in the East India Company's library has a similar
specification. The termination is, however, somewhat abrupt, and there is no
reason why the subject with which it ends should not have been carried on
farther. One copy in the Company's library, indeed, belonging to the Guicowar's
collection, states at the close that it is the end of the first Khanda, or
section. If the Purana was ever completed, the remaining portion of it appears
to be lost.
Jaimini,
the pupil of Vyasa, applies to Markandeya to be made acquainted with the nature
of Vasudeva, and for an explanation of some of the incidents described in the
Mahabharata; with the ambrosia of which divine poem, Vyasa he declares has
watered the whole world: a reference which establishes the priority of the
Bharata to the Markandeya Purana, however incompatible this may be with the
tradition, that having finished the Puranas, Vyasa wrote the poem.
Markandeya
excuses himself, saying he has a religious rite to perform; and he refers
Jaimini to some very sapient birds, who reside in the Vindhya mountains; birds
of a celestial origin, found, when just born, by the Muni S'amika, on the field
of Kurukshetra, and brought up by him along with his scholars: in consequence
of which, and by virtue of their heavenly descent, they became profoundly
versed in the Vedas, and a knowledge of spiritual truth. This machinery is
borrowed from the Mahabharata, with some embellishment. Jaimini accordingly has
recourse to the birds, Pingaksha and his brethren, and puts to them the
questions he had asked of the Muni. "Why was Vasudeva born as a mortal?
How was it that Draupadi was the wife of the five Pandus? Why did Baladeva do
penance for Brahmanicide? and why were the children of Draupadi destroyed, when
they had Krishna and Arjuna to defend them?" The answers to these
inquiries occupy a number of chapters, and form a sort of supplement to the
Mahabharata; supplying, partly by invention, perhaps, and partly by reference
to equally ancient authorities, the blanks left in some of its narrations.
Legends
of Vritrasura's death, Baladeva's penance, Haris'chandra's elevation to heaven,
and the quarrel between Vas'ishtha and Viswamitra, are followed by a discussion
respecting birth, death, and sin; which leads to a more extended description of
the different hells than is found in other Puranas. The account of creation
which is contained in this work is repeated by the birds after Markandeya's
account of it to Kroshtuki, and is confined to the origin of the Vedas and
patriarchal families, amongst whom are new characters, as Duhsaha and his wife
Marshti, and their descendants; allegorical personages, representing
intolerable iniquity and its consequences. There is then a description of the
world, with, as usual to this Purana, several singularities, some of which are
noticed in the following pages. This being the state of the world in the
Swayambhuva Manwantara, an account of the other Manwantaras succeeds, in which
the births of the Manus, and a number of other particulars, are peculiar to
this work. The present or Vaivaswata Manwantara is very briefly passed over;
but the next, the first of the future Manwantaras, contains the long episodical
narrative of the actions of the goddess Durga, which is the especial boast of
this Purana, and is the text-book of the worshippers of Kali, Chandi, or Durga,
in Bengal. It is the Chandi Patha, or Durga Mahatmya, in which the victories of
the goddess over different evil beings, or Asuras, are detailed with
considerable power and spirit. It is read daily in the temples of Durga, and
furnishes the pomp and circumstance of the great festival of Bengal, the Durga
puja, or public worship of that goddess.
After
the account of the Manwantaras is completed, there follows a series of legends,
some new, some old, relating to the sun and his posterity; continued to
Vaivaswata Manu and his sons, and their immediate descendants; terminating with
Dama, the son of Narishyanta. Of most of the persons noticed, the work narrates
particulars not found elsewhere.
This
Purana has a character different from that of all the others. It has nothing of
a sectarial spirit, little of a religious tone, rarely inserting prayers and
invocations to any deity, and such as are inserted are brief and moderate. It
deals little in precepts, ceremonial or moral. Its leading feature is
narrative, and it presents an uninterrupted succession of legends, most of
which, when ancient, are embellished with new circumstances; and when new, partake
so far of the spirit of the old, that they are disinterested creations of the
imagination, having no particular motive; being designed to recommend no
special doctrine or observance. Whether they are derived from any other source,
or whether they are original inventions, it is not possible to ascertain. They
are most probably, for the greater part at least, original; and the whole has
been narrated in the compiler's own manner, a manner superior to that of the
Puranas in general, with exception of the Bhagavata.
It
is not easy to conjecture a date for this Purana: it is subsequent to the
Mahabharata, but how long subsequent is doubtful. It is unquestionably more
ancient than such works as the Brahma, Padma, and Naradiya Puranas; and its
freedom from sectarial bias is a reason for supposing it anterior to the
Bhagavata. At the same time, its partial conformity to the definition of a
Purana, and the tenor of the additions which it has made to received legends
and traditions, indicate a not very remote age; and, in the absence of any
guide to a more positive conclusion, it may conjecturally be placed in the
ninth or tenth century.
8.
The Agni Purana
8.
Agni Purana. "That Purana which describes the occurrences of the Is'ana
Kalpa, and was related by Agni to Vas'ishtha, is called the Agneya: it consists
of sixteen thousand stanzas [*58]." The Agni or Agneya Purana derives its
name from its having being communicated originally by Agni, the deity of fire,
to the Muni Vas'ishtha, for the purpose of instructing him in the twofold
knowledge of Brahma [*59]. By him it was taught to Vyasa, who imparted it to
Suta; and the latter is represented as repeating it to the Rising at
Naimisharanya. Its contents are variously specified as sixteen thousand,
fifteen thousand, or fourteen thousand stanzas. The two copies which were
employed by me contain about fifteen thousand s'lokas. There are two in the
Company's library, which do not extend beyond twelve thousand verses; but they
are in many other respects different from mine: one of them was written at
Agra, in the reign of Akbar, in A. D. 1589.
The
Agni Purana, in the form in which it has been obtained in Bengal and at
Benares, presents a striking contrast to the Markandeya. It may be doubted if a
single line of it is original. A very great proportion of it may be traced to
other sources; and a more careful collation --if the task was worth the time it
would require--would probably discover the remainder.
The
early chapters of this Purana describe the Avataras; and in those of Rama and
Krishna avowedly follow the Ramayana and Mahabharata. A considerable portion is
then appropriated to instructions for the performance of religious ceremonies;
many of winch belong to the Tantrika ritual, and are apparently transcribed
from the principal authorities of that system. Some belong to mystical forms of
S'aiva worship, little known in Hindustan, though perhaps still practised in
the south. One of these is the Diksha, or initiation of a novice; by which,
with numerous ceremonies and invocations, in which the mysterious monosyllables
of the Tantras are constantly repeated, the disciple is transformed into a
living personation of S'iva, and receives in that capacity the homage of his
Guru. Interspersed with these, are chapters descriptive of the earth and of the
universe, which are the same as those of the Vishnu Purana; and Mahatmyas or
legends of holy places, particularly of Gaya. Chapters on the duties of kings,
and on the art of war, then occur, which have the appearance of being extracted
from some older work, as is undoubtedly the chapter on judicature, which
follows them, and which is the same as the text of the Mitakshara. Subsequent
to these, we have an account of the distribution and arrangement of the Vedas
and Puranas, which is little else than an abridgment of the Vishnu: and in a
chapter on gifts we have a description of the Puranas, which is precisely the
same, and in the same situation, as the similar subject in the Matsya Purana.
The genealogical chapters are meagre lists, differing in a few respects from
those commonly received, as hereafter noticed, but unaccompanied by any
particulars, such as those recorded or invented in the Markandeya. The next
subject is medicine, compiled avowedly, but injudiciously, from the Saus'ruta.
A series of chapters on the mystic worship of S'iva and Devi follows; and the
work winds up with treatises on rhetoric, prosody, and grammar, according to
the Sutras of Pingala and Panini.
The
cyclopaedical character of the Agni Purana, as it is now described, excludes it
from any legitimate claims to be regarded as a Purana, and proves that its
origin cannot be very remote. It is subsequent to the Itihasas; to the chief
works on grammar, rhetoric, and medicine; and to the introduction of the
Tantrika worship of Devi. When this latter took place is yet far from
determined, but there is every probability that it dates long after the
beginning of our era. The materials of the Agni, Purana are, however, no doubt
of some antiquity. The medicine of Sus'ruta is considerably older than the
ninth century; and the grammar of Panini probably precedes Christianity. The
chapters on archery and arms, and on regal administration, are also
distinguished by an entirely Hindu character, and must have been written long
anterior to the Mohammedan invasion. So far the Agni Purana is valuable, as
embodying and preserving relics of antiquity, although compiled at a more'
recent date.
Col.
Wilford has made great use of a list of kings derived from an appendix to the
Agni Purana, which professes to be the sixty-third or last section. As he
observes, it is seldom found annexed to the Purana. I have never met with it,
and doubt its ever having formed any part of the original compilation. It would
appear from Col. Wilford's remarks, that this list notices Mohammed as the
institutor of an era; but his account of this is not very distinct. He mentions
explicitly, however, that the list speaks of Salivahana and Vikramaditya; and
this is quite sufficient to establish its character. The compilers of the
Puranas were not such bunglers as to bring within their chronology so well
known a personage as Vikramaditya. There are in all parts of India various
compilations ascribed to the Puranas, which never formed any portion of their
contents, and which, although offering sometimes useful local information, and
valuable as preserving popular traditions, are not in justice to be confounded
with the Puranas, so as to cause them to be charged with even more serious
errors and anachronisms than those of which they are guilty.
The
two copies of this work in the library of the East India Company appropriate
the first half to a description of the ordinary and occasional observances of
the Hindus, interspersed with a few legends: the latter half treats exclusively
of the history of Mina.
9.
The Bhavishya Purana
9.
Bhavishya Purana. "The Purana in which Brahma, having described the
greatness of the sun, explained to Manu the existence of the world, and the
characters of all created things, in the course of the Aghora Kalpa; that, is
called the Bhavishya, the stories being for the most part the events of a
future period. It contains fourteen thousand five hundred stanzas [*62]."
This Purana, as the name implies, should be a book of prophecies, foretelling
what will be (bhavishyati), as the Matsya Purana intimates. Whether such a work
exists is doubtful. The copies, which appear to be entire, and of which there
are three in the library of the East India Company, agreeing in their contents
with two in my possession, contain about seven thousand stanzas. There is
another work, entitled the Bhavishyottara, as if it was a continuation or
supplement of the former, containing also about seven thousand verses; but the
subjects of .both these works are but to a very imperfect degree analogous to
those to which the Matsya alludes [*63].
The
Bhavishya Purana, as I have it, is a work in a hundred and twenty-six short
chapters, repeated by Sumantu to S'atanika, a king of the Pandu family. He
notices, however, its having originated with Swayambhu or Brahma; and describes
it as consisting of five parts; four dedicated, it should seem, to as many
deities, as they are termed, Brahma, Vaishnava, S'aiva, and Twashtra; whilst
the fifth is the Pratisarga, or repeated creation. Possibly the first part only
may have come into my hands, although it does not so appear by the manuscript.
Whatever
it may be, the work in question is not a Purana. The first portion, indeed,
treats of creation; but it is little else than a transcript of the words of the
first chapter of Manu. The rest is entirely a manual of religious rites and
ceremonies. It explains the ten Sanskaras, or initiatory rites; the performance
of the Sandhya; the reverence to be shewn to a Guru; the duties of the
different Asramas and castes; and enjoins a number of Vratas, or observances of
fasting and the like, appropriate to different lunar days. A few legends
enliven the series of precepts. That of the sage Chyavana is told at
considerable length, taken chiefly from the Mahabharata. The Naga Panchami, or
fifth lunation, sacred to the serpent-gods, gives rise to a description of
different sorts of snakes. After these, which occupy about one-third of the
chapters, the remainder of them conform in subject to one of the topics
referred to by the Matsya. They chiefly represent conversations between
Krishna, his son S'amba, who had become a leper by the curse of Durvasas,
Vas'ishtha, Narada, and Vyasa, upon the power and glory of the sun, and the
manner in which he is to be worshipped. There is some curious matter in the
last chapters, relating to the Magas, silent worshippers of the sun, from
Sakadwipa, as if the compiler had adopted the Persian term Magh, and connected
the fire-worshippers of Iran with those of India. This is a subject, however,
that requires farther investigation.
The
Bhavishyottara is, equally with the preceding, a sort of manual of religious
offices, the greater portion being appropriated to Vratas, and the remainder to
the forms and circumstances with which gifts are to be presented. Many of the
ceremonies are obsolete, or are observed in a different manner, as the
Rath-yatra, or car festival; and the Madanotsava, or festival of spring. The
descriptions of these throw some light upon the public condition of the Hindu
religion at a period probably prior to the Mohammedan conquest. The different
ceremonies are illustrated by legends, which are sometimes ancient, as, for
instance, the destruction of the god of love by S'iva, and his thence becoming
Ananga, the disembodied lord of hearts. The work is supposed to be communicated
by Krishna to Yudhishthira, at a great assemblage of holy persons at the
coronation of the latter, after the conclusion of the great war.
10.
The Brahma-vaivartta Purana
10.
Brahma-vaivartta Purana. "That Purana which is related by Savarni to
Narada, and contains the account of the greatness of Krishna, with the
occurrences of the Rathantara Kalpa, where also the story of Brahma-varaha is
repeatedly told, is called the Brahma-vaivartta, and contains eighteen thousand
stanzas." The account here given of the Brahma-vaivartta Purana agrees
with its present state as to its extent. The copies rather exceed than fall
short of eighteen thousand stanzas. It also correctly represents its comprising
a Mahatmya or legend of Krishna; but it is very doubtful, nevertheless, if the
same work is intended.
The
Brahma-vaivartta, as it now exists, is narrated, not by Savarni, but the Rishi
Narayana to Narada, by whom it is communicated to Vyasa: he teaches it to Suta,
and the latter repeats it to the Rishis at Naimisharanya. It is divided into
four Khandas, or books; the Brahma, Prakriti, Ganes'a, and Krishna Janma
Khandas; dedicated severally to describe the acts of Brahma, Devi, Ganes'a, and
Krishna; the latter, however, throughout absorbing the interest and importance
of the work. In none of these is there any account of the Varaha Avatara of
Vishnu, which seems to be intended by the Matsya; nor any reference to a
Rathantara Kalpa. It may also be observed, that, in describing the merit of
presenting a copy of this Purana, the Matsya adds, "Whoever makes such
gift, is honoured in the Brahma-loka;" a sphere which is of very inferior
dignity to that to which a worshipper of Krishna is taught to aspire by this
Purana. The character of the work is in truth so decidedly sectarial, and the
sect to which it belongs so distinctly marked, that of the worshippers of the
juvenile Krishna and Radha, a form of belief of known modern origin, that it
can scarcely have found a notice in a work to which, like the Matsya, a much
more remote date seems to belong. Although therefore the Matsya may be received
in proof of there having been a Brahma-vaivartta Purana at the date of its
compilation, dedicated especially to the honour of Krishna, yet we cannot credit
the possibility of its being the same we now possess.
Although
some of the legends believed to be ancient are scattered through the different
portions of this Purana, yet the great mass of it is taken up with tiresome
descriptions of Vrindavan and Goloka, the dwellings of Krishna on earth and in
heaven; with endless repetitions of prayers and invocations addressed to him;
and with insipid descriptions of his person and sports, and the love of the
Gopis and of Radha towards him. There are some particulars of the origin of the
artificer castes, which is of value because it is cited as authority in matters
affecting them, contained in the Brahma Khanda; and in the Prakrita and Ganes'a
Khandas are legends of those divinities, not wholly, perhaps, modern
inventions, but of which the source has not been traced. In the life of Krishna
the incidents recorded are the same as those narrated in the Vishnu and the
Bhagavata; but the stories, absurd as they are, are much compressed to make
room for original matter, still more puerile and tiresome. The Brahma-vaivartta
has not the slightest title to be regarded as a Purana.
11.
The Linga Purana
11.
Linga Purana. "Where Mahes'wara, present in the Agni Linga, explained (the
objects of life) virtue, wealth, pleasure, and final liberation at the end of
the Agni Kalpa, that Purana, consisting of eleven thousand stanzas, was called
the Lainga by Brahma himself."
The
Linga Purana conforms accurately enough to this description. The Kalpa is said
to be the Is'ana, but this is the only difference. It consists of eleven
thousand stanzas. It is said to have been originally composed by Brahma; and
the primitive Linga is a pillar of radiance, in which Mahes'wara is present.
The work is therefore the same as that referred to by the Matsya.
A
short account is given, in the beginning, of elemental and secondary creation,
and of the patriarchal families; in which, however, S'iva takes the place of
Vishnu, as the indescribable cause of all things. Brief accounts of S'iva's
incarnations and proceedings in different Kalpas next occur, offering no
interest except as characteristic of sectarial notions. The appearance of the
great fiery Linga takes place, in the interval of a creation, to separate
Vishnu and Brahma, who not only dispute the palm of supremacy, but fight for
it; when the Linga suddenly springs up, and puts them both to shame; as, after
travelling upwards and downwards for a thousand years in each direction,
neither can approach to its termination. Upon the Linga the sacred monosyllable
Om is visible, and the Vedas proceed from it, by which Brahms and Vishnu become
enlightened, and acknowledge and eulogize the superior might and glory of
S'iva.
A
notice of the creation in the Padma Kalpa then follows, and this leads to
praises of S'iva by Vishnu and Brahma. S'iva repeats the story of his
incarnations, twenty-eight in number; intended as a counterpart, no doubt, to
the twenty-four Avataras of Vishnu, as described in the Bhagavata; and both
being amplifications of the original ten Avataras, and of much less merit as
fictions. Another instance of rivalry occurs in the legend of Dadhichi, a Muni
and worshipper of S'iva. In the Bhagavata there is a story of Ambarisha being
defended against Durvasas by the discus of Vishnu, against which that S'aiva
sage is helpless: here Vishnu hurls his discus at Dadhichi, but it falls
blunted to the ground, and a conflict ensues, in which Vishnu and his partisans
are all overthrown by the Muni.
A
description of the universe, and of the regal dynasties of the Vaivaswata
Manwantara to the time of Krishna, runs through a number of chapters, in
substance, and very commonly in words, the same as in other Puranas. After
which, the work resumes its proper character, narrating legends, and enjoining
rites, and reciting prayers, intending to do honour to S'iva under various
forms. Although, however, the Linga holds a prominent place amongst them, the
spirit of the worship is as little influenced by the character of the type as
can well be imagined. There is nothing like the phallic orgies of antiquity: it
is all mystical and spiritual. The Linga is twofold, external and internal. The
ignorant, who need a visible sign, worship S'iva through a 'mark' or
'type'--which is the proper meaning of the word 'Linga'--of wood or stone; but
the wise look upon this outward emblem as nothing, and contemplate in their
minds the invisible, inscrutable type, which is S'iva himself. Whatever may
have been the origin of this form of worship in India, the notions upon which
it was founded, according to the impure fancies of European writers, are not to
be traced in even the S'aiva Puranas.
Data
for conjecturing the era of this work are defective, but it is more of a ritual
than a Purana, and the Pauranik chapters which it has inserted, in order to
keep up something of its character, have been evidently borrowed for the
purpose. The incarnations of S'iva, and their 'pupils,' as specified in one
place, and the importance attached to the practice of the Yoga, render it
possible that under the former are intended those teachers of the S'aiva
religion who belong to the Yoga school, which seems to have flourished about
the eighth or ninth centuries. It is not likely that the work is earlier, it
may be considerably later. It has preserved apparently some S'aiva legends of
an early date, but the greater part is ritual and mysticism of comparatively
recent introduction.
12.
The Varaha Purana
12.
Varaha Purana. "That in which the glory of the great Varaha is
predominant, as it was revealed to Earth by Vishnu, in connexion, wise Munis,
with the Manava Kalpa, and which contains twenty-four thousand verses, is
called the Varaha Purana [*68]."
It
may be doubted if the Varaha Purana of the present day is here intended. It is
narrated by Vishnu as Varaha, or in the boar incarnation, to the personified
Earth. Its extent, however, is not half that specified, little exceeding ten
thousand stanzas. It furnishes also itself evidence of the prior currency of
some other work, similarly denominated; as, in the description of Mathura
contained in it, Sumantu, a Muni, is made to observe, "The divine Varaha
in former times expounded a Purana, for the purpose of solving the perplexity
of Earth."
Nor
can the Varaha Purana be regarded as a Purana agreeably to the common
definition, as it contains but a few scattered and brief allusions to the
creation of the world, and the reign of kings: it has no detailed genealogies
either of the patriarchal or regal families, and no account of the reigns of
the Manus. Like the Linga Purana, it is a religious manual, almost wholly
occupied with forms of prayer, and rules for devotional observances, addressed
to Vishnu; interspersed with legendary illustrations, most of which are
peculiar to itself, though some are taken from the common and ancient stock:
many of them, rather incompatibly with the general scope of the compilation,
relate to the history of S'iva and Durga. A considerable portion of the work is
devoted to descriptions of various Tirthas, places of Vaishnava pilgrimage; and
one of Mathura enters into a variety of particulars relating to the shrines of
that city, constituting the Mathura Mahatmyam.
In
the sectarianism of the Varaha Purana there is no leaning to the particular
adoration of Krishna, nor are the Rath-yatra and Janmashtami included amongst
the observances enjoined. There are other indications of its belonging to an
earlier stage of Vaishnava worship, and it may perhaps be referred to the age
of Ramanuja, the early part of the twelfth century.
13.
The Skanda Purana
13.
Skanda Purana. "The Skanda Purana is that in which the six-faced deity
(Skanda) has related the events of the Tatpurusha Kalpa, enlarged with many
tales, and subservient to the duties taught by Mahes'wara. It is said to
contain eighty-one thousand one hundred stanzas: so it is asserted amongst
mankind."
It
is uniformly agreed that the Skanda Purana in a collective form has no
existence; and the fragments in the shape of Sanhitas, Khandas, and Mahatmyas,
which are affirmed in various parts of India to be portions of the Purana,
present a much more formidable mass of stanzas than even the immense number of
which it is said to consist. The most celebrated of these portions in Hindustan
is the Kas'i Khanda, a very minute description of the temples of S'iva in or
adjacent to Benares, mixed with directions for worshipping Mahes'wara, and a
great variety of legends explanatory of its merits, and of the holiness of
Kas'i: many of them are puerile and uninteresting, but some are of a higher
character. The story of Agastya records probably, in a legendary style, the
propagation of Hinduism in the south of India: and in the history of Divodasa,
king of Kas'i, we have an embellished tradition of the temporary depression of
the worship of S'iva, even in its metropolis, before the ascendancy of the
followers of Buddha [*71], There is every reason to believe the greater part of
the contents of the Kas'i Khanda anterior to the first attack upon Benares by
Mahmud of Ghizni. The Kas'i Khanda alone contains fifteen thousand stanzas.
Another
considerable work ascribed in upper India to the Skanda Purana is the Utkala
Khanda, giving an account of the holiness of Urissa, and the Kshetra of
Purushottama or Jagannatha. The same vicinage is the site of temples, once of
great magnificence and extent, dedicated to S'iva, as Bhuvanes'wara, which
forms an excuse for attaching an account of a Vaishnava Tirtha to an eminently
S'aiva Purana. There can be little doubt, however, that the Utkala Khanda is
unwarrantably included amongst the progeny of the parent work. Besides these,
there is a Brahmottara Khanda, a Reva Khanda, a S'iva Rahasya Khanda, a Himavat
Khanda, and others. Of the Sanhitas, the chief are the Suta Sanhita,
Sanatkumara Sanhita, Saura Sanhita, and Kapila Sanhita: there are several other
works denominated Sanhitas. The Mahatmyas are more numerous still. According to
the Suta Sanhita, as quoted by Col. Vans Kennedy, the Skanda Purana contains
six Sanhitas, five hundred Khandas, and five hundred thousand stanzas; more
than is even attributed to all the Puranas. He thinks, judging from internal
evidence, that all the Khandas and Sanhitas may be admitted to be genuine,
though the Mahatmyas have rather a questionable appearance. Now one kind of
internal evidence is the quantity; and as no more than eighty-one thousand one
hundred stanzas have ever been claimed for it, all in excess above that amount
must be questionable. But many of the Khandas, the Kas'i Khanda for instance,
are quite as local as the Mahatmyas, being legendary stories relating to the
erection and sanctity of certain temples or groups of temples, and to certain
Lingas; the interested origin of which renders them very reasonably objects of
suspicion. In the present state of our acquaintance with the reputed portions
of the Skanda Purana, my own views of their authenticity are so opposed to
those entertained by Col. Vans Kennedy, that instead of admitting all the
Sanhitas and Khandas to be genuine, I doubt if any one of them was ever a part
of the Skanda Purana.
14.
The Vamana Purana
14.
Vamana Purana. "That in which the four-faced Brahma taught the three
objects of existence, as subservient to the account of the greatness of
Trivikrama, which treats also of the S'iva Kalpa, and which consists of ten
thousand stanzas, is called the Vamana Purana."
The
Vamana Purana contains an account of the dwarf incarnation of Vishnu; but it is
related by Pulastya to Narada, and extends to but about seven thousand stanzas.
Its contents can scarcely establish its claim to the character of a Purana.
There
is little or no order in the subjects which this work recapitulates, and which
arise out of replies made by Pulastya to questions put abruptly and
unconnectedly by Narada. The greater part of them relate to the worship of the
Linga; a rather strange topic for a Vaishnava Purana, but engrossing the
principal part of the compilation. They are however subservient to the object
of illustrating the sanctity of certain holy places; so that the Vamana Purana
is little else than a succession of Mahatmyas. Thus in the opening almost of
the work occurs the story of Daksha's sacrifice, the object of which is to send
S'iva to Papamochana tirtha at Benares, where he is released from the sin of
Brahmanicide. Next conies the story of the burning of Kamadeva, for the purpose
of illustrating the holiness of a S'iva-linga at Kedares'wara in the Himalaya,
and of Badarikas'rama. The larger part of the work consists of the
Saro-mahatmya, or legendary exemplifications of the holiness of Sthanu tirtha;
that is, of the sanctity of various Lingas and certain pools at Thanesar and
Kurukhet, the country north-west from Delhi. There are some stories also relating
to the holiness of the Godavari river; but the general site of the legends is
in Hindustan. In the course of these accounts we have a long narrative of the
marriage of S'iva with Uma, and the birth of Kartikeya. There are a few brief
allusions to creation and the Manwantaras, but they are merely incidental; and
all the five characteristics of a Purana are deficient. In noticing the
Swarochisha Manwantara, towards the end of the book, the elevation of Bali as
monarch of the Daityas, and his subjugation of the universe, the gods included,
are described; and this leads to the narration that gives its title to the
Purana, the birth of Krishna as a dwarf, for the purpose of humiliating Bali by
fraud, as he was invincible by force. The story is told as usual, but the scene
is laid at Kurukshetra.
A
more minute examination of this work than that which has been given to it might
perhaps discover some hint from which to conjecture its date. It is of a more
tolerant character than the Puranas, and divides its homage between S'iva and
Vishnu with tolerable impartiality. It is not connected, therefore, with any
sectarial principles, and may have preceded their introduction. It has not,
however, the air of any antiquity, and its compilation may have amused the
leisure of some Brahman of Benares three or four centuries ago.
15.
The Kurma Purana
15.
Kurma Purana. "That in which Janarddana, in the form of a tortoise, in the
regions under the earth, explained the objects of life--duty, wealth, pleasure,
and liberation--in communication with Indradyumna and the Rishis in the
proximity of S'akra, which refers to the Lakshmi Kalpa, and contains seventeen
thousand stanzas, is the Kurma Purana."
In
the first chapter of the Kurma Purana it gives an account of itself, which does
not exactly agree with this description. Suta, who is repeating the narration,
is made to say to the Rishis, "This most excellent Kaurma Purana is the
fifteenth. Sanhitas are fourfold, from the variety of the collections. The
Brahmi, Bhagavati, Sauri, and Vaishnavi, are well known as the four Sanhitas
which confer virtue, wealth, pleasure, and liberation. This is the Brahmi
Sanhita, conformable to the four Vedas; in which there are six thousand
s'lokas, and by it the importance of the four objects of life, O great sages,
holy knowledge and Parames'wara is known." There is an irreconcilable difference
in this specification of the number of stanzas and that given above. It is not
very clear what is meant by a Sanhita as here used. A Sanhita, as observed
above (p. xi), is something different from a Purana. It may be an assemblage of
prayers and legends, extracted professedly from a Purana, but is not usually
applicable to the original. The four Sanhitas here specified refer rather to
their religious character than to their connexion with any specific work, and
in fact the same terms are applied to what are called Sanhitas of the Skanda.
In this sense a Purana might be also a Sanhita; that is, it might be an
assemblage of formulae and legends belonging to a division of the Hindu system;
and the work in question, like the Vishnu Purana, does adopt both titles. It
says, "This is the excellent Kaurma Purana, the fifteenth (of the
series):" and again, "This is the Brahmi Sanhita." At any rate,
no other work has been met with pretending to be the Kurma Purana.
With
regard to the other particulars specified by the Matsya, traces of them are to
be found. Although in two accounts of the traditional communication of the
Purana no mention is made of Vishnu as one of the teachers, yet Suta repeats at
the outset a dialogue between Vishnu, as the Kurma, and Indradyumna, at the
time of the churning of the ocean; and much of the subsequent narrative is put
into the mouth of the former.
The
name, being that of an Avatara of Vishnu, might lead us to expect a Vaishnava
work; but it is always and correctly classed with the S'aiva. Puranas, the
greater portion of it inculcating the worship of S'iva and Durga. It is divided
into two parts, of nearly equal length. In the first part, accounts of the
creation, of the Avataras of Vishnu, of the solar and lunar dynasties of the
kings to the time of Krishna, of the universe, and of the Manwantaras, are
given, in general in a summary manner, but not unfrequently in the words
employed in the Vishnu Purana. With these are blended hymns addressed to
Mahes'wara by Brahma and others; the defeat of Andhakasura by Bhairava; the
origin of four S'aktis, Mahes'wari, S'iva, S'ati, and Haimavati, from S'iva;
and other S'aiva legends. One chapter gives a more distinct and connected
account of the incarnations of S'iva in the present age than the Linga; and it
wears still more the appearance of an attempt to identify the teachers of the
Yoga school with personations of their preferential deity. Several chapters
form a Kas'i Mahatmya, a legend of Benares. In the second part there are no
legends. It is divided into two parts, the Is'wara Gita [*77] and Vyasa Gita.
In the former the knowledge of god, that is, of S'iva, through contemplative
devotion, is taught. In the latter the same object is enjoined through works,
or observance of the ceremonies and precepts of the Vedas.
The
date of the Kurma Purana cannot be very remote, for it is avowedly posterior to
the establishment of the Tantrika, the Sakta, and the Jain sects. In the
twelfth chapter it is said, "The Bhairava, Vama, Arhata, and Yamala
S'astras are intended for delusion." There is no reason to believe that
the Bhairava and Yamala Tantras are very ancient works, or that the practices
of the left-hand S'aktas, or the doctrines of Arhat or Jina were known in the
early centuries of our era.
The
Matsya Purana
16.
Matsya Purana. "That in which, for the sake of promulgating the Vedas,
Vishnu, in the beginning of a Kalpa, related to Manu the story of Narasinha and
the events of seven Kalpas, that, O sages, know to be the Matsya Purana,
containing twenty thousand stanzas."
We
might, it is to be supposed, admit the description which the Matsya gives of
itself to be correct, and yet as regards the number of verses there seems to be
a mistatement. Three very good copies, one in my possession, one in the
Company's library, and one in the Radcliffe library, concur in all respects,
and in containing no more than between fourteen and fifteen thousand stanzas:
in this case the Bhagavata is nearer the truth, when it assigns to it fourteen
thousand. We may conclude, therefore, that the reading of the passage is in
this respect erroneous. It is correctly said that the subjects of the Purana
were communicated by Vishnu, in the form of a fish, to Manu.
The
Purana, after the usual prologue of Suta and the Rishis, opens with the account
of the Matsya or 'fish' Avatara of Vishnu, in which he preserves a king named
Manu, with the seeds of all things, in an ark, from the waters of that
inundation which in the season of a Pralaya overspreads the world. This story
is told in the Mahabharata, with reference to the Matsya as its authority; from
which it might be inferred that the Purana was prior to the poem. This of
course is consistent with the tradition that the Puranas were first composed by
Vyasa; but there can be no doubt that the greater part of the Mahabharata is
much older than any extant Purana. The present instance is itself a proof; for
the primitive simplicity with which the story of the fish Avatara is told in
the Mahabharata is of a much more antique complexion than the mysticism and
extravagance of the actual Matsya Purana. In the former, Manu collects the
seeds of existing things in the ark, it is not said how: in the latter, he
brings them all together by the power of Yoga.
In
the latter, the great serpents come to the king, to serve as cords wherewith to
fasten the ark to the horn of the fish: in the former, a cable made of ropes is
more intelligibly employed for the purpose.
Whilst
the ark floats, fastened to the fish, Manu enters into conversation with him;
and his questions, and the replies of Vishnu, form the main substance of the
compilation. The first subject is the creation, which is that of Brahma and the
patriarchs. Some of the details are the usual ones; others are peculiar,
especially those relating to the Pitris, or progenitors. The regal dynasties
are next described; and then follow chapters on the duties of the different
orders. It is in relating those of the householder, in which the duty of making
gifts to Brahmans is comprehended, that we have the specification of the extent
and subjects of the Puranas. It is meritorious to have copies made of them, and
to give these away on particular occasions. Thus it is said of the Matsya;
"Whoever gives it away at either equinox, along with a golden fish and a
milch cow, gives away the whole earth;" that is, he reaps a like reward in
his next migration. Special duties of the householder--Vratas, or occasional
acts of piety--are then described at considerable length, with legendary
illustrations. The account of the universe is given in the usual strain. S'aiva
legends ensue; as, the destruction of Tripurasura; the war of the gods with
Taraka and the Daityas, and the consequent birth of Kartikeya, with the various
circumstances of Uma's birth and marriage, the burning of Kamadeva, and other
events involved in that narrative; the destruction of the Asuras Maya and
Andhaka; the origin of the Matris, and the like; interspersed with the
Vaishnava legends of the Avataras. Some Mahatmyas are also introduced; one of
which, the Narmada Mahatmya, contains some interesting particulars. There are
various chapters on law and morals; and one which furnishes directions for
building houses, and making images. We then have an account of the kings of
future periods; and the Purana concludes with a chapter on gifts.
The
Matsya Purana, it will be seen even from this brief sketch of its contents, is
a miscellaneous compilation, but including in its contents the elements of a
genuine Purana. At the same time it is of too mixed a character to be
considered as a genuine work of the Pauranik class; and upon examining it
carefully, it may be suspected that it is indebted to various works, not only
for its matter, but for its words. The genealogical and historical chapters are
much the same as those of the Vishnu; and many chapters, as those on the Pitris
and Sraddhas, are precisely the same as those of the Srishti Khanda of the
Padma Purana. It has drawn largely also from the Mahabharata: amongst other
instances, it is sufficient to quote the story of Savitri, the devoted wife of
Satyavat, which is given in the Matsya in the same manner, but considerably
abridged.
Although
a S'aiva work, it is not exclusively so, and it has no such sectarial
absurdities as the Kurma and Linga. It is a composition of considerable
interest; but if it has extracted its materials from the Padma, which it also
quotes on one occasion, the specification of the Upa-puranas, it is subsequent
to that work, and therefore not very ancient.
17.
The Garuda Purana
17.
Garuda Purana. "That which Vishnu recited in the Garuda Kalpa, relating
chiefly to the birth of Garuda from Vinata, is here called the Garuda Purana;
and in it there are read nineteen thousand verses."
The
Garuda Purana which has been the subject of my examination corresponds in no
respect with this description, and is probably a different work, though
entitled the Garuda Purana. It is identical, however, with two copies in the
Company's library. It consists of no more than about seven thousand stanzas; it
is repeated by Brahma to Indra; and it contains no account of the birth of
Garuda. There is a brief notice of the creation; but the greater part is
occupied with the description of Vratas, or religious observances, of holidays,
of sacred places dedicated to the sun, and with prayers from the Tantrika
ritual, addressed to the sun, to S'iva, and to Vishnu. It contains also
treatises on astrology, palmistry, and precious stones; and one, still more
extensive, on medicine. The latter portion, called the Preta Kalpa, is taken up
with directions for the performance of obsequial rites. There is nothing in all
this to justify the application of the name. Whether a genuine Garuda Purana
exists is doubtful. The description given in the Matsya is less particular than
even the brief notices of the other Puranas, and might have easily been written
without any knowledge of the book itself, being, with exception of the number
of stanzas, confined to circumstances that the title alone indicates.
18.
The Brahmanda Purana
18.
Brahmanda Purana. "That which has declared, in twelve thousand two hundred
verses, the magnificence of the egg of Brahma, and in which an account of the
future Kalpas is contained, is called the Brahmanda Purana, and was revealed by
Brahma."
The
Brahmanda Purana is usually considered to be in much the same predicament as
the Skanda, no longer procurable in a collective body, but represented by a
variety of Khandas and Mahatmyas, professing to be derived from it. The
facility with which any tract may be thus attached to the non-existent
original, and the advantage that has been taken of its absence to compile a
variety of unauthentic fragments, have given to the Brahmanda, Skanda, and
Padma, according to Col. Wilford, the character of being the Puranas of thieves
or impostors. This is not applicable to the Padma, which, as above shewn,
occurs entire and the same in various parts of India. The imposition of which
the other two are made the vehicles can deceive no one, as the purpose of the
particular legend is always too obvious to leave any doubt of its origin.
Copies
of what profess to be the entire Brahmanda Purana are sometimes, though rarely,
procurable. I met with one in two portions, the former containing, one hundred
and twenty-four chapters, the latter seventy-eight; and the whole containing
about the number of stanzas assigned to the Purana. The first and largest
portion, however, proved to be the same as the Vayu Purana, with a passage
occasionally slightly varied, and at the end of each chapter the common phrase
'Iti Brahmanda Purane' substituted for 'Iti Vayu Purane.' I do not think there
was any intended fraud in the substitution. The last section of the first part
of the Vayu Purana is termed the Brahmanda section, giving an account of the
dissolution of the universe; and a careless or ignorant transcriber might have
taken this for the title of the whole. The checks to the identity of the work
have been honestly preserved, both in the index and the frequent specification
of Vayu as the teacher or narrator of it.
The
second portion of this Brahmanda is not any part of the Vayu; it is probably
current in the Dakhin as a Sanhita or Khanda. Agastya is represented as going
to the city Kanchi (Conjeveram), where Vishnu, as Hayagriva, appears to him,
and, in answer to his inquiries, imparts to him the means of salvation, the
worship of Paras'akti. In illustration of the efficacy of this form of
adoration, the main subject of the work is an account of the exploits of Lalita
Devi, a form of Durga, and her destruction of the demon Bhandasura. Rules for
her worship are also given, which are decidedly of a S'akta or Tantrika
description; and this work cannot be admitted, therefore, to be part of a
genuine Purana.
The
Upa-puranas
The
Upa-puranas, in the few instances which are known, differ little in extent or
subject from some of those to which the title of Purana is ascribed. The Matsya
enumerates but four; but the Devi Bhagavata has a more complete list, and
specifies eighteen. They are, 1. The Sanatkumara, 2. Narasinha, 3. Naradiya, 4.
S'iva, 5. Durvasasa, g. Kapila, 7. Manava, 8. Aus'anas'a, 9. Varuna, 10.
Kalika, 11. S'amba, 12. Nandi, 13. Saura, 14. Paras'ara, 15. Aditya, 16.
Mahes'wara, 17. Bhagavata, 18. Vas'ishtha. The Matsya observes of the second,
that it is named in the Padma Purana, and contains eighteen thousand verses.
The Nandi it calls Nanda, and says that Kartikeya tells in it the story of
Nanda. A rather different list is given in the Reva Khanda; or, 1. Sanatkumara,
2. Narasinha, 3. Nanda, 4. S'ivadharma, 5. Durvasasa, 6. Bhavishya, related by
Narada or Naradiya, 7. Kapila, 8. Manava, 9. Aus'anas'a, 10. Brahmanda, 11.
Varuna, 12. Kalika, 13. Mahes'wara, 14. S'amba, 15. Saura, 16. Paras'ara, 17.
Bhagavata, 18. Kaurma. These authorities, however, are of questionable weight,
having in view, no doubt, the pretensions of the Devi Bhagavata to be
considered as the authentic Bhagavata.
Of
these Upa-puranas few are to be procured. Those in my possession are the S'iva,
considered as distinct from the Vayu; the Kalika, and perhaps one of the
Naradiyas, as noticed above. I have also three of the Skandhas of the Devi
Bhagavata, which most undoubtedly is not the real Bhagavata, supposing that any
Purana so named preceded the work of Vopadeva. There can be no doubt that in
any authentic list the name of Bhagavata does not occur amongst the
Upa-puranas: it has been put there to prove that there are two works so
entitled, of which the Purana is the Devi Bhagavata, the Upa-purana the S'ri
Bhagavata. The true reading should be Bhargava, the Purana of Bhrigu; and the
Devi Bhagavata is not even an Upa-purana. It is very questionable if the entire
work, which as far as it extends is eminently a Sakta composition, ever had
existence.
The
S'iva Upa-purana contains about six thousand stanzas, distributed into two
parts. It is related by Sanatkumara to Vyasa and the Rishis at Naimisharanya,
and its character may be judged of from the questions to which it is a reply.
"Teach us," said the Rishis, "the rules of worshipping the
Linga, and of the god of gods adored under that type; describe to us his
various forms, the places sanctified by him, and the prayers with which he is
to be addressed." In answer, Sanatkumara repeats the S'iva Purana,
containing the birth of Vishnu and Brahma; the creation and divisions of the
universe; the origin of all things from the Linga; the rules of worshipping it
and S'iva; the sanctity of times, places, and things, dedicated to him; the
delusion of Brahma and Vishnu by the Linga; the rewards of offering flowers and
the like to a Linga; rules for various observances in honour of Mahadeva; the
mode of practising the Yoga; the glory of Benares and other S'aiva Tirthas; and
the perfection of the objects of life by union with Mahes'wara. These subjects
are illustrated in the first part with very few legends; but the second is made
up almost wholly of S'aiva stories, as the defeat of Tripurasura; the sacrifice
of Daksha; the births of Kartikeya and Ganes'a the sons of S'iva, and Nandi and
Bhringariti his attendants and others; together with descriptions of Benares
and other places of pilgrimage, and rules for observing such festivals as the
S'ivaratri. This work is a S'aiva manual, not a Purana.
The
Kalika Purana contains about nine thousand stanzas in ninety-eight chapters,
and is the only work of the series dedicated to recommend the worship of the
bride of S'iva, in one or other of her manifold forms, as Girija, Devi,
Bhadrakali, Kali, Mahamaya. It belongs therefore to the Sakta modification of
Hindu belief, or the worship of the female powers of the deities. The influence
of this worship spews itself in the very first pages of the work, which relate
the incestuous passion of Brahma for his daughter Sandhya, in a strain that has
nothing analogous to it in the Vayu, Linga, or S'iva Puranas.
The
marriage of S'iva and Parvati is a subject early described, with the sacrifice
of Daksha, and the death of Sati: and this work is authority for S'iva's
carrying the dead body about the world, and the origin of the Pithasthanas, or
places where the different members of it were scattered, and where Lingas were
consequently erected. A legend follows of the births of Bhairava and Vetala,
whose devotion to different forms of Devi furnishes occasion to describe in
great detail the rites and formulae of which her worship consists, including
the chapters on sanguinary sacrifices, translated in the Asiatic Researches.
Another peculiarity in this work is afforded by very prolix descriptions of a
number of rivers and mountains at Kamarupa-tirtha in Asam, and rendered holy
ground by the celebrated temple of Durga in that country, as Kamaks'hi or
Kamakhya. It is a singular, and yet uninvestigated circumstance, that Asam, or
at least the north-east of Bengal, seems to have been in a great degree the
source from which the Tantrika and S'akta corruptions of the religion of the
Vedas and Puranas proceeded.
The
specification of the Upa-puranas, whilst it names several of which the
existence is problematical, omits other works, bearing the same designation,
which are sometimes met with. Thus in the collection of Col. Mackenzie [*82] we
have a portion of the Bhargava, and a Mudgala Purana, which is probably the
same with the Ganes'a Upa-purana, cited by Col. Vans Kennedy . I have also
a copy of the Ganes'a Purana, which seems to agree with that of which he
speaks; the second portion being entitled the Krida Khanda, in which the
pastimes of Ganes'a, including a variety of legendary matters, are described.
The main subject of the work is the greatness of Ganes'a, and prayers and
formulae appropriate to him are abundantly detailed. It appears to be a work
originating with the Ganapatya sect, or worshippers of Ganes'a. There is also a
minor Purana called Adi, or 'first,' not included in the list. This is a work,
however, of no great extent or importance, and is confined to a detail of the
sports of the juvenile Krishna.
THE ROLE OF PRAYER.
= THOUGHT: CREATIVE AND EXHAUSTIVE. MEDITATION EXERCISE.
HIGHER REASON AND
JUDGMENT= CONQUEST OF FEAR.
QUEEN CHUNDALAI, THE
GREAT YOGIN
THE POWER OF
DHARANA, DHIYANA, AND SAMYAMA YOGA.
THE POWER OF THE
PRANAYAMA YOGA.
KUNDALINI,
THE MOTHER OF THE UNIVERSE.
TO THE KUNDALINI—THE
MOTHER OF THE UNIVERSE.
Yoga Vashist part-1
-or- Heaven Found by Rishi Singh Gherwal
Shakti and Shâkta
-by Arthur Avalon (Sir John Woodroffe),
Mahanirvana Tantra-
All- Chapter -1 Questions relating to
the Liberation of Beings
Tantra
of the Great Liberation
श्वेतकेतु और
उद्दालक, उपनिषद की कहानी, छान्द्योग्यापनिषद,
GVB THE UNIVERSITY OF VEDA
यजुर्वेद मंत्रा
हिन्दी व्याख्या सहित, प्रथम अध्याय 1-10, GVB THE
UIVERSITY OF VEDA
उषस्ति की
कठिनाई, उपनिषद की कहानी, आपदकालेमर्यादानास्ति,
_4 -GVB the uiversity of veda
वैराग्यशतकम्, योगी
भर्तृहरिकृत, संस्कृत काव्य, हिन्दी
व्याख्या, भाग-1, gvb the university of Veda
G.V.B. THE
UNIVERSITY OF VEDA ON YOU TUBE
इसे भी पढ़े-
इन्द्र औ वृत्त युद्ध- भिष्म का युधिष्ठिर को उपदेश
इसे भी पढ़े
- भाग- ब्रह्मचर्य वैभव
Read Also Next
Article- A Harmony of Faiths and Religions
इसे भी पढ़े-
भाग -2, ब्रह्मचर्य की प्राचीनता
वैदिक इतिहास
संक्षीप्त रामायण की कहानीः-
वैदिक ऋषियों
का सामान्य परिचय-1
वैदिक इतिहास
महाभारत की सुक्ष्म कथाः-
वैदिक ऋषियों
का सामान्य परिचय-2 –वैदिक ऋषि अंगिरस
वैदिक
विद्वान वैज्ञानिक विश्वामित्र के द्वारा अन्तरिक्ष में स्वर्ग की स्थापना
राजकुमार और
उसके पुत्र के बलिदान की कहानीः-
पुरुषार्थ और विद्या- ब्रह्मज्ञान
संस्कृत के अद्भुत सार गर्भित विद्या श्लोक हिन्दी अर्थ सहित
श्रेष्ट
मनुष्य समझ बूझकर चलता है"
पंचतंत्र- कहानि क्षुद्रवुद्धि गिदण की
कनफ्यूशियस के शिष्य चीनी विद्वान के शब्द। लियोटालस्टा
कहानी माधो चमार की-लियोटलस्टाय
पर्मार्थ कि यात्रा के सुक्ष्म सोपान
जीवन संग्राम -1, मिर्जापुर का परिचय
0 Comments
If you have any Misunderstanding Please let me know